<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; Health care</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/category/health-care/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 02:54:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>HSAs Could Bring Health Costs Down; Too Bad Obamacare Destroys Them</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/18/hsas-could-bring-health-costs-down-too-bad-obamacare-destroys-them/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/18/hsas-could-bring-health-costs-down-too-bad-obamacare-destroys-them/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alyene Senger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ongoing Priorities]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=98478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Consumer-directed health plans have become increasing popular because of their ability to save consumers money. Breaking research published by Health Affairs shows that if consumer-directed health plans increased as a share of employer-sponsored plans from 12.4 percent to 50 percent, it could save $57.1 billion annually in national health expenditures. The report states, “Savings of this magnitude would account for 7 percent of all health care spending for the population with employer-sponsored insurance and 4 percent for the nonelderly population as a whole.” The study uses two types of consumer-directed &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/18/hsas-could-bring-health-costs-down-too-bad-obamacare-destroys-them/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/18/hsas-could-bring-health-costs-down-too-bad-obamacare-destroys-them/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Side Effects: Obamacare’s CO-OPs Put Taxpayer Dollars at Risk for No Good Reason</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/16/side-effects-obamacares-co-ops-put-taxpayer-dollars-at-risk-for-no-good-reason/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/16/side-effects-obamacares-co-ops-put-taxpayer-dollars-at-risk-for-no-good-reason/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 21:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alyene Senger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[centers for medicare and medicaid services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Co-Ops]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consumer operated and oriented plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama health care law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[side effects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=98264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Yet another provision of Obamacare is expected to cost taxpayers more than they expected. The House Energy and Commerce Committee recently sent a letter to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) asking for details regarding the probable loss of $3.1 billion out of the $3.4 billion in Obamacare loans to its Consumer Operated and Oriented Plan (“CO-OP”). The estimate comes from the President’s Budget Appendix, and the committee is considering rescinding funds that haven’t already been obligated. The Obamacare initiative gives CMS the authority to award $3.4 billion &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/16/side-effects-obamacares-co-ops-put-taxpayer-dollars-at-risk-for-no-good-reason/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/16/side-effects-obamacares-co-ops-put-taxpayer-dollars-at-risk-for-no-good-reason/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another Fairly Insane Cross-National Health Care Comparison</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/sp3E1Ymxoz4/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/sp3E1Ymxoz4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aids drugs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church of universal coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deadweight loss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excess burden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ghana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Economics and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[julio frenk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rwanda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uninsured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universal coverage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>Yesterday, countless newspapers published a really disappointing story by Noam Levey that the Los Angeles Times ran under this title: Global push to guarantee health coverage leaves U.S. behind; China, Mexico and other countries far less affluent are working to provide medical insurance for all citizens. It&#8217;s viewed as an economic investment. The article is little more [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/another-fairly-insane-cross-national-health-care-comparison/">Another Fairly Insane Cross-National Health Care Comparison</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/another-fairly-insane-cross-national-health-care-comparison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stop Using Slippery-Slope Arguments? Where Would that End?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/z2x9uwy-Q5w/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/z2x9uwy-Q5w/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 14:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broccoli mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief justice john roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[richard thaler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slippery slope]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>Richard Thaler writes in the New York Times: Justice Scalia is arguing that if the court lets Congress create a mandate to buy health insurance, nothing could stop Congress from passing laws requiring everyone to buy broccoli and to join a gym&#8230;Can anyone imagine Congress passing a broccoli mandate law, much less the court allowing it to take [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/stop-using-slippery-slope-arguments-where-would-that-end/">Stop Using Slippery-Slope Arguments? Where Would that End?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/stop-using-slippery-slope-arguments-where-would-that-end/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dealing with Fiscal Challenges</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/_Zj_15fUnco/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/_Zj_15fUnco/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 18:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jagadeesh Gokhale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47827</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Jagadeesh Gokhale</p>I was recently asked the following: You gotta figure: States defaulting on pension obligations through bankruptcy and/or action by legislatures. Some de facto defaults will likely be to promise payment at age 90 or whatever. National governments, including the US, also likely defaulting on everything, gov&#8217;t bonds and so-called &#8220;entitlements.&#8221; So, pensioners, city, state and [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/dealing-with-fiscal-challenges/">Dealing with Fiscal Challenges</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/dealing-with-fiscal-challenges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>J.P. Morgan and Yahoo: Market Successes</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/i9Y8vqO84eI/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/i9Y8vqO84eI/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 17:53:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[j p morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicaid fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicare fraud]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public choice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scott Thompson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47812</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>Investment giant J.P. Morgan made a bad trade that cost its owners $2 billion. The responsible parties are losing their jobs. Yahoo&#8217;s CEO evidently misled people about his qualifications. As a result, he lost his job. If you want to know why these are market successes, consider: Medicare and Medicaid lose at least 35 times [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/j-p-morgan-and-yahoo-market-successes/">J.P. Morgan and Yahoo: Market Successes</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/j-p-morgan-and-yahoo-market-successes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gov. Christie Vetoes ObamaCare Exchange — ‘At This Time’</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/CWI4X9uVH4U/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/CWI4X9uVH4U/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 17:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exchange connector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance exchanges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>Today, New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie (R) became the latest governor to throw sand in the gears of ObamaCare, issuing an eleventh-hour veto of a bill to create an ObamaCare Exchange in New Jersey. An excerpt from his veto message: While I am unwilling to approve the establishment of a statewide health insurance exchange at this [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/gov-christie-vetoes-obamacare-exchange-at-this-time/">Gov. Christie Vetoes ObamaCare Exchange &#8212; &#8216;At This Time&#8217;</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/gov-christie-vetoes-obamacare-exchange-at-this-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will Gov. Christie Volunteer New Jersey for ObamaCare’s Tax Hikes?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/chLefIljPgM/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/chLefIljPgM/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 12:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chris Christie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exchange connector]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance exchanges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance exchange]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>Today is his last chance to stop an ObamaCare Exchange. Will Gov. Christie Volunteer New Jersey for ObamaCare’s Tax Hikes? is a post from Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/will-gov-christie-volunteer-new-jersey-for-obamacares-tax-hikes/">Will Gov. Christie Volunteer New Jersey for ObamaCare’s Tax Hikes?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/will-gov-christie-volunteer-new-jersey-for-obamacares-tax-hikes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Did You Read the Federalist Papers in College? Grad School? Law School?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/jUR5Ys9otuo/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/jUR5Ys9otuo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 16:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Commerce Clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education and Child Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalist papers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>In the Wall Street Journal, Peter Berkowitz says you probably didn&#8217;t. And it shows: It would be difficult to overstate the significance of The Federalist for understanding the principles of American government and the challenges that liberal democracies confront early in the second decade of the 21st century. Yet despite the lip service they pay to [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/did-you-read-the-federalist-papers-in-college-grad-school-law-school/">Did You Read the Federalist Papers in College? Grad School? Law School?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/did-you-read-the-federalist-papers-in-college-grad-school-law-school/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Side Effects: Another Obamacare Initiative Bites the Dust</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/04/side-effects-another-obamacare-initiative-bites-the-dust/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/04/side-effects-another-obamacare-initiative-bites-the-dust/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2012 18:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alyene Senger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[centers for medicare and medicaid services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-existing conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[side effects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=97512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />On Monday, the Obama Administration signaled that another part of its signature health care law may not be working out as planned. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) put an end to a program that offered a $100 incentive to insurance brokers and agents for recommending eligible people to Obamacare’s Pre-Existing Conditions Insurance Plan (PCIP). Obamacare created the PCIP, commonly called a high-risk pool, as a temporary way to cover those with pre-existing or chronic conditions before 2014, when insurance companies will be prohibited from excluding people based &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/04/side-effects-another-obamacare-initiative-bites-the-dust/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/04/side-effects-another-obamacare-initiative-bites-the-dust/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

