<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; National Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/category/national-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:21:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Ideology of Isolationism</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/21/the-ideology-of-isolationism/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/21/the-ideology-of-isolationism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 13:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Spalding</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[founding fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isolationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[limited government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ron paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Founders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington’s Farewell Address]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=88855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Supporters of Ron Paul have re-launched an old ad promoting the old idea of American isolationism.  “We now are a nation known to start war,” Paul is quoted as saying.  “We feel compelled because of our insecurity that we have to go over and attack these countries to maintain our empire.”  The message here (and repeated elsewhere) is that Paul’s isolationism is aligned with the Founding Fathers and “what is truly American and truly constitutional.” Not only is this refrain a gross misrepresentation of American history but it offers dangerously &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/21/the-ideology-of-isolationism/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/21/the-ideology-of-isolationism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voters in Iowa, New Hampshire Say Federal Budget Deficit Is No. 1 Issue</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/29/voters-in-iowa-new-hampshire-say-federal-budget-deficit-is-no-1-issue/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/29/voters-in-iowa-new-hampshire-say-federal-budget-deficit-is-no-1-issue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Bluey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iowa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ongoing Priorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[poll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scribe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment rate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://author.blog.heritage.org/?p=87288</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />New polling data reveals that voters in Iowa and New Hampshire overwhelmingly believe the federal budget deficit is the most important economic issue facing the United States today. Despite the nation&#8217;s persistent high unemployment rate, voters in the two early-voting states chose the deficit by wide margins. The CNN/Time/ORC poll was conducted before and after Christmas with 999 registered Republicans in Iowa and a total of 1,508 adults in New Hampshire. The results, released Wednesday, paint a clear picture about what voters are thinking about heading into 2012. They also &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/29/voters-in-iowa-new-hampshire-say-federal-budget-deficit-is-no-1-issue/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/29/voters-in-iowa-new-hampshire-say-federal-budget-deficit-is-no-1-issue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CNN Debate Draws Attention to EMP Threat</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/02/cnn-debate-draws-attention-to-emp-threat/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/02/cnn-debate-draws-attention-to-emp-threat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 20:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jackson Marsteller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AEI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Electro-Magnetic Pulse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GOP debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protect America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=85401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Talk of an electromagnetic pulse (EMP) attack at the Republican National Security Debate, hosted on CNN by The Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute, sparked CNN to interview Heritage’s James Carafano last week to discuss the devastating impacts of an EMP. Unfortunately, the United States remains unprotected from the effects of an EMP. As the video explains, an EMP is a high-intensity burst of electromagnetic energy caused by a rapid acceleration of charged particles. An EMP can disrupt all electronic devices within its zone of impact by burning circuits &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/02/cnn-debate-draws-attention-to-emp-threat/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/02/cnn-debate-draws-attention-to-emp-threat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Critics Applaud Heritage-AEI-CNN Presidential Debate</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/29/critics-applaud-heritage-presidential-debate/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/29/critics-applaud-heritage-presidential-debate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rory Cooper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AEI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cnn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution Hall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ongoing Priorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=85002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Last week, millions of Americans tuned in to CNN to watch eight presidential contenders debate foreign policy and national security issues live from Washington D.C.&#8217;s Constitution Hall. Questions were asked by policy experts from The Heritage Foundation and the American Enterprise Institute, the co-hosts of debate. Critics agree that it was the &#8220;most substantive&#8221; debate of the season. Here are a few of those reactions. What did you think? Let us know in the comments below! … a substantive debate that brought to the fore differences among candidates on a &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/29/critics-applaud-heritage-presidential-debate/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/29/critics-applaud-heritage-presidential-debate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Strong National Security–the Prerequisite for Peaceful Commerce</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/22/strong-national-security-the-prerequisite-for-peaceful-commerce/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/22/strong-national-security-the-prerequisite-for-peaceful-commerce/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marion Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commerce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Founders]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imperialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Adams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[peace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ron paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=84506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />The slogan “War breeds war. Peace breeds prosperity” has become a favorite idea of the anti-war faction on the right. Unlike their anti-war allies on the left, who favor protectionism, those like Congressman Ron Paul (R–TX) are rightly committed to economic freedom. Their mistake lies in thinking that commerce and security are separate issues. Nothing could be more at odds with the experience of American statecraft. In 1789, the blessings of liberty secured by the Constitution began to manifest themselves (see chart) as imports (light blue) and exports (dark blue) &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/22/strong-national-security-the-prerequisite-for-peaceful-commerce/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/22/strong-national-security-the-prerequisite-for-peaceful-commerce/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

