<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; Tax and Budget Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/category/tax-and-budget-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:46:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>CBO Forecast Accuracy</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/7yfZ7Tn5UJY/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/7yfZ7Tn5UJY/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 19:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Edwards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43832</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Chris Edwards</p>Economic variables are key drivers of the numbers in CBO’s budget projections. I noted last week that CBO’s new outlook assumes substantially lower interest rates, which appears to produce more than a trillion dollars of savings over the next decade. Policymakers should be aware, however, that macroeconomic forecasts are not very accurate, despite the sophisticated [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/cbo-forecast-accuracy/">CBO Forecast Accuracy</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/cbo-forecast-accuracy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has Congress Cut Any Spending Yet?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/4x_OLoSRoLA/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/4x_OLoSRoLA/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Edwards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Chris Edwards</p>It’s been a year since Republicans assumed control in the House in the wake of the 2010 elections, which were powered by Tea Party concerns about massive federal spending and deficits. With the more conservative House, has Congress made any progress on spending cuts yet? Let’s compare the new CBO budget projections to CBO’s January [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/has-congress-cut-any-spending-yet/">Has Congress Cut Any Spending Yet?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/has-congress-cut-any-spending-yet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Year Later, Another Look at Obamanomics vs. Reaganomics</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/xjENt98k3D4/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/xjENt98k3D4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 14:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamanomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reaganomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel J. Mitchell</p>On this day last year, I posted two charts that I developed using the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank&#8217;s interactive website. Those two charts showed that the current recovery was very weak compared to the boom of the early 1980s. But perhaps that was an unfair comparison. Maybe the Reagan recovery started strong and then hit [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/one-year-later-another-look-at-obamanomics-vs-reaganomics/">One Year Later, Another Look at Obamanomics vs. Reaganomics</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/one-year-later-another-look-at-obamanomics-vs-reaganomics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Agriculture and Trade Links</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/9HCOmetjd9o/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/9HCOmetjd9o/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sallie James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade and Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Sallie James</p>A very good editorial on Bloomberg.com on farm subsidies, and why the &#8220;let&#8217;s swap direct payments for crop insurance&#8221; proposal is a bad deal for taxpayers. American Farm Bureau Federation President Bob Stallman isn&#8217;t exactly a poster child for the farm program reform movement, but here he writes something I didn&#8217;t think would ever flow from [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/agriculture-and-trade-links/">Agriculture and Trade Links</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/agriculture-and-trade-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/2xU3CC4eU50/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/2xU3CC4eU50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balanced budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entitlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax increases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel J. Mitchell</p>Back in 2010, I crunched the numbers from the Congressional Budget Office and reported that the budget could be balanced in just 10 years if politicians exercised a modicum of ...<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/new-congressional-budget-office-numbers-once-again-show-that-modest-spending-restraint-would-eliminate-red-ink/">New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/new-congressional-budget-office-numbers-once-again-show-that-modest-spending-restraint-would-eliminate-red-ink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CBO Study on Federal Pay</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/ZlL1sjQMCp4/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/ZlL1sjQMCp4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Edwards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Chris Edwards</p>CBO has released a study comparing the wages and benefits of private sector and federal non-military workers. The study uses statistical techniques to make comparisons with adjustments for education level, ...<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/cbo-study-on-federal-pay/">CBO Study on Federal Pay</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/cbo-study-on-federal-pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Academic Study Confirms Previous IMF Analysis, Shows that Lower Tax Rates Are the Best Way to Reduce Tax Evasion</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/qMBkqQMg6EQ/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/qMBkqQMg6EQ/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flat tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax avoidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax evasion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Underground Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel J. Mitchell</p>Leftists want higher tax rates and they want greater tax compliance. But they have a hard time understanding that those goals are inconsistent.
Simply stated, people respond to incentives. When tax ...<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/new-academic-study-confirms-previous-imf-analysis-shows-that-lower-tax-rates-are-the-best-way-to-reduce-tax-evasion/">New Academic Study Confirms Previous IMF Analysis, Shows that Lower Tax Rates Are the Best Way to Reduce Tax Evasion</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/new-academic-study-confirms-previous-imf-analysis-shows-that-lower-tax-rates-are-the-best-way-to-reduce-tax-evasion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Arlo Sings Bailouts</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/YDUn-xb1_mU/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/YDUn-xb1_mU/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 13:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Boaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance, Banking & Monetary Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43031</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By David Boaz</p>Only days after the president declared, &#8220;No more bailouts, no more handouts,&#8221; I see that Arlo Guthrie is touring the South in February and March. What&#8217;s the connection? If you have the good fortune to see him, be sure to ask for &#8220;I&#8217;m Changing My Name to Fannie Mae.&#8221; That 2008 song was itself a new [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/arlo-sings-bailouts/">Arlo Sings Bailouts</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/arlo-sings-bailouts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Laffer Curve Works, Even in France</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/kFXU-noanos/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/kFXU-noanos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[france]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Economics and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laffer curve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel J. Mitchell</p>One year ago, I wrote about how the French government was getting unexpected additional revenues following the implementation of lower tax rates.
This is the Laffer Curve in action, and it&#8217;s ...<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-laffer-curve-works-even-in-france/">The Laffer Curve Works, Even in France</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-laffer-curve-works-even-in-france/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Professor Cornpone: Ethanol Lobbyist Newt Gingrich—and the Future of the GOP’</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/JzhjSAfuHJI/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/JzhjSAfuHJI/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 22:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Reynolds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy and Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43333</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Alan Reynolds</p>The title is from a Wall Street Journal editorial in January of 2011. I commented on Gingrich&#8217;s response to that editorial in the following excerpt from a chapter I wrote ...<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/%E2%80%9Cprofessor-cornpone-ethanol-lobbyist-newt-gingrich%E2%80%94and-the-future-of-the-gop%E2%80%9D/">&#8216;Professor Cornpone: Ethanol Lobbyist Newt Gingrich—and the Future of the GOP&#8217;</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/%e2%80%9cprofessor-cornpone-ethanol-lobbyist-newt-gingrich%e2%80%94and-the-future-of-the-gop%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

