<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; amicus briefs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/amicus-briefs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacare Challenge Not Barred By a Weird Technicality</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/8_O6P7qbse4/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/8_O6P7qbse4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:28:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Inunction Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>Cato&#8217;s third Supreme Court brief in the Obamacare litigation concerns the issue of whether the federal tax Anti-Injunction Act prevents federal courts from timely reviewing Congress&#8217;s most egregious attempt to exceed its power to regulate interstate commerce. The AIA bars courts from enjoining &#8220;any tax&#8221; before that tax is assessed or collected. One would think [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamacare-challenge-not-barred-by-a-weird-technicality/">Obamacare Challenge Not Barred By a Weird Technicality</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamacare-challenge-not-barred-by-a-weird-technicality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ‘Law of Nations’ Is What It Was in 1789</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/b_fDG-jtmpo/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/b_fDG-jtmpo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law of nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of our oldest laws, the Alien Tort Statute (1789), grants federal courts jurisdiction over lawsuits brought by aliens for actions “in violation of the law of nations.” Courts have differed in their method of interpreting this “law of nations” &#8212; an old way of saying “international law” &#8211; and thus in their decisions on what [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-law-of-nations-is-what-it-was-in-1789/">The &#8216;Law of Nations&#8217; Is What It Was in 1789</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-law-of-nations-is-what-it-was-in-1789/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The First Amendment Protects Students’ Rights to Speak on Religious Subjects</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/-R-aV9ejef4/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/-R-aV9ejef4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 17:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifth Circuit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>If the First Amendment means anything, then school officials cannot prohibit students from handing out gifts with Christmas messages due to the religious content of those messages. Nonetheless, the Fifth Circuit ...<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-first-amendment-protects-students-rights-to-speak-on-religious-subjects/">The First Amendment Protects Students&#8217; Rights to Speak on Religious Subjects</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-first-amendment-protects-students-rights-to-speak-on-religious-subjects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Rejects Texas Redistricting Maps, Showing That Modern Voting Rights Act Is Outmoded and Unworkable</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/PWRbfx3oeFA/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/PWRbfx3oeFA/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifteenth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perry v perez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=42913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>Two weeks ago I wrote about the emergency appeal of Texas&#8217;s new redistricting maps that reached the Supreme Court last month and was argued early last week.  The state argued that the interim maps a three-judge district court in San Antonio drew didn&#8217;t defer sufficiently to the maps passed by the Texas legislature (which could [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/supreme-court-rejects-texas-redistricting-maps-showing-that-modern-voting-rights-act-is-outmoded-and-unworkable/">Supreme Court Rejects Texas Redistricting Maps, Showing That Modern Voting Rights Act Is Outmoded and Unworkable</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/supreme-court-rejects-texas-redistricting-maps-showing-that-modern-voting-rights-act-is-outmoded-and-unworkable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacare’s Medicaid Expansion Violates Federalism</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/tLq2wM6Tqos/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/tLq2wM6Tqos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable care act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coercion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenth amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=42689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>Today Cato filed its second Supreme Court amicus brief in the Obamacare litigation, on the issue of whether the health care law&#8217;s Medicaid expansion is a proper exercise of the Constitution&#8217;s Spending Clause. That is, states must now accept a comprehensive reorganization of Medicaid or forfeit all federal Medicaid funding—even though the spending power is circumscribed [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamacares-medicaid-expansion-violates-federalism/">Obamacare&#8217;s Medicaid Expansion Violates Federalism</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamacares-medicaid-expansion-violates-federalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacare at the Supreme Court: Can the Individual Mandate Be Severed?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/Ib6Zil0z2EQ/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/Ib6Zil0z2EQ/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 18:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[epstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[severability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=42247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>The Obamacare litigation has arrived on the big stage: the Supreme Court. The first opportunity for those opposing the legislation to weigh in comes on the issue that will be the last one the Court considers, &#8220;severability.&#8221; That is, if the individual mandate is struck down as unconstitutional, what (if any) of the rest of [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamacare-at-the-supreme-court-can-the-individual-mandate-be-severed/">Obamacare at the Supreme Court: Can the Individual Mandate Be Severed?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamacare-at-the-supreme-court-can-the-individual-mandate-be-severed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Against Forced Unionization of Independent Workers</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/7L4_14OPLvY/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/7L4_14OPLvY/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 13:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NLRA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unions]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=42160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>Over the past decade, more than a dozen states have forced independent contractors who are paid through Medicaid to join public-sector unions.In 2003, Illinois unionized home healthcare workers and imbued the Service Employees International Union with the right to collect compulsory fees from the workers’ paychecks. Democracy is thus being turned on its head: the [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/against-forced-unionization-of-independent-workers/">Against Forced Unionization of Independent Workers</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/against-forced-unionization-of-independent-workers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Enforcing Housing Codes Is Not Racist</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/7F8C3BKGsQw/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/7F8C3BKGsQw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:22:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disparate impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Housing Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FHA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=42140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>The federal Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful &#8220;[t]o refuse to sell or rent after the making of a bona fide offer . . . or otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any person because of race, color, religion, sex, familial status, or national origin.&#8221;  Magner v. Gallagher addresses the question of whether [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/enforcing-housing-codes-is-not-racist/">Enforcing Housing Codes Is Not Racist</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/enforcing-housing-codes-is-not-racist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Should Use Texas Redistricting Case to Reconsider Voting Rights Act</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/RPvIzqAm7iI/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/RPvIzqAm7iI/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14th amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[15th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifteenth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=42044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>The decennial redrawing of electoral districts consistently produces extensive litigation. The most notable cases this cycle come, as they often have, from Texas. A number of activist groups challenged the Texas legislature&#8217;s maps for state house, state senate, and congressional districts, alleging racial discrimination under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in a special [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/supreme-court-should-use-texas-redistricting-case-to-reconsider-voting-rights-act/">Supreme Court Should Use Texas Redistricting Case to Reconsider Voting Rights Act</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/supreme-court-should-use-texas-redistricting-case-to-reconsider-voting-rights-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The IRS Can’t Overrule the Supreme Court</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/pR6fBtB9Hwk/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/pR6fBtB9Hwk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 19:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[APA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=41872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>Since the foundational administrative law case of Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council (1984), courts have given significant deference to executive agency interpretations of federal law. United States v. Home Concrete &#038; Supply tests whether there are any meaningful limits on such deference. The case involves a group of taxpayers who initiated a number of [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-irs-cant-overrule-the-supreme-court/">The IRS Can&#8217;t Overrule the Supreme Court</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-irs-cant-overrule-the-supreme-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

