<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; citizens united</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/citizens-united/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Citizens United at Two</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/b1R_IhfdKjo/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/b1R_IhfdKjo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 19:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Caleb O. Brown</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[catoinstitutevideo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[center for competitive politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizens united]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Common Cause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate personhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal election commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ilya shapiro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john samples]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[move to amend]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=42962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Caleb O. Brown</p>The Supreme Court decided Citizens United two years ago this week. The complaints about the ruling that have emerged since are often bizarre and misrepresent much of the landmark ruling&#8217;s import. Here&#8217;s what the case was about. Almost nowhere in the complaints about the Citizens United ruling will you hear that the case decided that [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/citizens-united-at-two/"><em>Citizens United</em> at Two</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/citizens-united-at-two/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Published: So What If Corporations Aren’t People?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/_oYsoKpocus/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/_oYsoKpocus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 13:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizens united]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=41727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>Six months ago, I wrote about a law review article I had just co-authored with former Cato legal associate Caitlyn McCarthy regarding corporate rights post-Citizens United.  Well, now it’s officially published, in The John Marshall Law Review.  Here’s the abstract: Corporate participation in public discourse has long been a controversial issue, one that was reignited by the [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/published-so-what-if-corporations-arent-people/">Published: So What If Corporations Aren&#8217;t People?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/published-so-what-if-corporations-arent-people/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘OCCUPIED’ Constitutional Amendment Would Eliminate Due Process for Corporations</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/30/occupied-constitutional-amendment-would-eliminate-due-process-for-corporations/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/30/occupied-constitutional-amendment-would-eliminate-due-process-for-corporations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 14:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lachlan Markay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizens united]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[citizens united vs. FEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[constitutional amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scribe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=85118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />A constitutional amendment offered in the House of Representatives would strip American companies of all protections guaranteed by the Bill of Rights. While the amendment is aimed at curbing free speech rights afforded third party groups by the Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. FEC, it would, whether intended or not, open the door to a host of gross violations of Americans’ civil rights. The proposed amendment, offered by Rep. Theodore Deutch (D-FL) on Nov. 18, is wholly a product of the violent and subversive &#8220;Occupy&#8221; protest movement currently unwinding across the &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/30/occupied-constitutional-amendment-would-eliminate-due-process-for-corporations/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/11/30/occupied-constitutional-amendment-would-eliminate-due-process-for-corporations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

