<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; detentions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/detentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Real Trouble With the Defense Authorization Bill</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/-DbBqYaIUmc/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/-DbBqYaIUmc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin H. Friedman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense authorization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detentions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[enemy combatant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hamdi v. rumsfeld]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeland security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=41124</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Benjamin H. Friedman</p>The Senate on Thursday passed the 2012 defense-authorization bill. It includes a controversial provision meant to put al-Qaeda suspects and their associates in military custody rather than prosecute them as criminals. The White House has rather weakly threatened a veto, complaining primarily that the bill undercuts their discretion in dealing with terrorists. If the White [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-real-trouble-with-the-defense-authorization-bill/">The Real Trouble With the Defense Authorization Bill</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-real-trouble-with-the-defense-authorization-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

