<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; doj</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/doj/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 21:30:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. v. Heicklen: The Nullification of Free Speech</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/01/u-s-v-heicklen-the-nullification-of-free-speech/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/01/u-s-v-heicklen-the-nullification-of-free-speech/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 17:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Luppino-Esposito</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kimba Wood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. v. Heicklen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=97063</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Prosecution for exercising one’s free speech rights is becoming a trend in the current Administration and the Department of Justice (DOJ). Earlier this month, the Legal Center highlighted the DOJ’s outrageous prosecution of Mary Susan Pine, a pro-life advocate. Thankfully, when the rubber hit the road, the DOJ lawyers had nowhere to go, and the suit was dropped. Pine is able to continue her ministry of standing near an abortion clinic to talk to women about abortion. Julian P. Heicklen, an 80-year-old retired chemistry professor and advocate of jury nullification, &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/01/u-s-v-heicklen-the-nullification-of-free-speech/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/01/u-s-v-heicklen-the-nullification-of-free-speech/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scribecast: Voter ID Proponents Launch Counteroffensive Against DOJ</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/03/17/scribecast-voter-id-proponents-launch-counteroffensive-against-doj/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/03/17/scribecast-voter-id-proponents-launch-counteroffensive-against-doj/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Bluey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Human Rights Council]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john paul stevens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naacp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scribe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scribecast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Section 5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter ID]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voting rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=93807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder is currently blocking implementation of voter ID laws in South Carolina and Texas. It&#8217;s the latest battle in the fight for voter integrity at the ballot box and the reason two supporters of voter ID are launching a robust defense the laws. &#8220;We believe this offensive by the Justice Department must be met with a counteroffensive,&#8221; said Ken Blackwell, Ohio&#8217;s former secretary of state. He is working on the project with Ken Klukowski, a fellow with the American Civil Rights Union and faculty member at &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2012/03/17/scribecast-voter-id-proponents-launch-counteroffensive-against-doj/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/03/17/scribecast-voter-id-proponents-launch-counteroffensive-against-doj/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://thf_media.s3.amazonaws.com/2012/mp3/Scribecast-03-17-12.mp3" length="0" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Photo ID for DOJ, But Not for Texas</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/03/12/photo-id-for-doj-but-not-for-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/03/12/photo-id-for-doj-but-not-for-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 21:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hans Von Spakovsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter ID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=93406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />To no one’s surprise, the Obama Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division have objected to the voter ID law passed by the Texas legislature. The DOJ under Attorney General Eric Holder claims that it is discriminatory under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act for Texas to require voters to present a government-issued photo ID at the polling place, because it will supposedly hurt Hispanic voters—even though any Texan can get a photo ID for free. Never mind that if you want to exercise your First Amendment right to “petition the &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2012/03/12/photo-id-for-doj-but-not-for-texas/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/03/12/photo-id-for-doj-but-not-for-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>South Carolina and Voter ID: When Politics Drives Law Enforcement</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/27/south-carolina-and-voter-id-when-politics-drives-law-enforcement/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/27/south-carolina-and-voter-id-when-politics-drives-law-enforcement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 21:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hans Von Spakovsky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOMA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eric Holder]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naacp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Black Panther Party]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rule of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South Carolina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voter ID]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=87173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Attorney General Eric Holder put a lump of coal in South Carolina’s Christmas stocking on Dec. 23 when he objected to the state’s new voter ID law. By ignoring inconvenient facts and clear legal precedent, Holder showed once again that politics and ideology—not the rule of law—drive his law enforcement decisions. Given the power of the Justice Department and its potential for abuse, this should worry all Americans, particularly when that abuse has the potential to affect the outcome of next year’s election. South Carolina passed a voter ID law &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/27/south-carolina-and-voter-id-when-politics-drives-law-enforcement/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/27/south-carolina-and-voter-id-when-politics-drives-law-enforcement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOJ and FCC: Making the Wrong Call on Wireless Deal</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/20/doj-and-fcc-making-the-wrong-call-on-wireless-deal/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/20/doj-and-fcc-making-the-wrong-call-on-wireless-deal/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 16:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Diane Katz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise and Free Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TMobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wireless]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=86727</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />It’s rather remarkable, really, how willing federal bureaucrats are to block business deals that they speculate will cause price hikes and yet give nary a thought to foisting more than a trillion dollars annually in regulatory costs on the public. That’s one takeaway from the news that AT&#038;T has scrapped its proposed $39 billion acquisition of struggling T-Mobile USA (from Deutsche Telekom AG) after a bruising nine-month battle with the U.S. Justice Department and the Federal Communications Commission. Bureaucrats at both agencies concluded that the deal could (maybe, perhaps) hurt &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/20/doj-and-fcc-making-the-wrong-call-on-wireless-deal/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/20/doj-and-fcc-making-the-wrong-call-on-wireless-deal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

