<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; due process</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/due-process/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>EPA Actions Should Be Subject to Judicial Review</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/xZcYaj3SXkQ/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/xZcYaj3SXkQ/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 21:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[property rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wetlands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=42429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>Michael and Chantelle Sackett bought some Idaho land and began placing gravel fill on the site to prepare for laying a foundation for their dream home. Then they got something from the EPA: a &#8220;Compliance Order,&#8221; declaring that they were in violation of the Clean Water Act, because their land had been deemed a &#8220;wetland&#8221; [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/epa-actions-should-be-subject-to-judicial-review/">EPA Actions Should Be Subject to Judicial Review</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/epa-actions-should-be-subject-to-judicial-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ninth Circuit Gets It Right, Deregulates the Bone Marrow Market</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/Wac931dV7K8/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/Wac931dV7K8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bone marrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Institute for Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NOTA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=41015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>This blogpost was coauthored by Cato legal associate Chaim Gordon. Thanks to the Institute for Justice, those suffering from leukemia and various other ailments that require them to wait for a bone marrow match to miraculously appear have new hope. Yesterday’s unanimous opinion by the Ninth Circuit in Flynn v. Holder effectively deregulates the bone-marrow market&#8212;and [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/ninth-circuit-gets-it-right-deregulates-the-bone-marrow-market/">Ninth Circuit Gets It Right, Deregulates the Bone Marrow Market</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/ninth-circuit-gets-it-right-deregulates-the-bone-marrow-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rent Control Violates Property Rights and Due Process</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/zk7RLw4JEj4/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/zk7RLw4JEj4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rent control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=40890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>This blogpost was coauthored by Cato legal associate Trevor Burrus, who also worked on the brief discussed below. Rent control is literally a textbook example of bad economic policy. Economics textbooks often use it as an example of how price ceilings create shortages, poor quality goods, and under-the-table dealings. A 1992 survey revealed that 93 [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/rent-control-violates-property-rights-and-due-process/">Rent Control Violates Property Rights and Due Process</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/rent-control-violates-property-rights-and-due-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More on the Constitution’s Lack of a Drug-War Exception</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/9mcPyy5gs_g/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/9mcPyy5gs_g/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:27:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criminal procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drug war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Florida]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mens rea]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=40897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>Challenges to Florida&#8217;s unconstitutional drug laws continue to gain momentum. Following a successful federal district court challenge to the constitutionality of state statutes lacking a mens rea requirement (mental culpability, rather than, for example, incidental possession), people convicted under them have come forward en masse to ask Florida courts to reexamine their convictions. As described in the background [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/more-on-the-constitutions-lack-of-a-drug-war-exception/">More on the Constitution&#8217;s Lack of a Drug-War Exception</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/more-on-the-constitutions-lack-of-a-drug-war-exception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

