<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; federal spending</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/federal-spending/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Earmarks are a Symptom of the Problem</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/yoid3A3pUvk/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/yoid3A3pUvk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tad DeHaven</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Earmarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal federalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43915</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Washington Post investigation identified dozens of examples of federal policymakers directing federal dollars to projects that benefited their property or an immediate family member. Members of Congress have been enriching themselves at taxpayer expense? In other news, the sun rose this morning. According to the Post, “Under the ethics rules Congress has written for [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/earmarks-are-a-symptom-of-the-problem/">Earmarks are a <i>Symptom</i> of the Problem</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/earmarks-are-a-symptom-of-the-problem/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/2xU3CC4eU50/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/2xU3CC4eU50/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[balanced budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entitlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[higher taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax increases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel J. Mitchell</p>Back in 2010, I crunched the numbers from the Congressional Budget Office and reported that the budget could be balanced in just 10 years if politicians exercised a modicum of ...<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/new-congressional-budget-office-numbers-once-again-show-that-modest-spending-restraint-would-eliminate-red-ink/">New Congressional Budget Office Numbers Once Again Show that Modest Spending Restraint Would Eliminate Red Ink</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/new-congressional-budget-office-numbers-once-again-show-that-modest-spending-restraint-would-eliminate-red-ink/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senator Schumer’s Feeble Grasp of Fiscal History</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/zNZesbt7cMs/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/zNZesbt7cMs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 17:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Senator Schumer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=41444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel J. Mitchell</p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of Senator Schumer of New York. As I&#8217;ve noted before, he&#8217;s a doctrinaire statist who wants the government to have control over just about every aspect of our lives. But that describes a lot of people in Washington. I guess what also bothers me is his willingness to say anything, [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/senator-schumers-feeble-grasp-of-fiscal-history/">Senator Schumer&#8217;s Feeble Grasp of Fiscal History</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/senator-schumers-feeble-grasp-of-fiscal-history/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Looking for Serious Program Terminations</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/VaSd9wV5_Fo/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/VaSd9wV5_Fo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tad DeHaven</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit reduction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[election action committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[presidential election campaign fund]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=41151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Tad DeHaven</p>The House passed a bill last week eliminating the Presidential Election Campaign Fund, which the Tax Foundation calls a “voluntary tax that stirs little enthusiasm.” It would also save a whopping $14 million by eliminating the Election Action Committee and transferring certain functions to other federal agencies. The Republican-sponsored bill passed on a straight party-line [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/looking-for-serious-program-terminations/">Looking for Serious Program Terminations</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/looking-for-serious-program-terminations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Debate Needed on Nuclear Weapons Spending</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/3yObutt_s-M/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/3yObutt_s-M/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 18:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Preble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glenn Kessler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military spending cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=41009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Christopher Preble</p>Nuclear weapons have played a major role in U.S. force planning for many decades. But we have never had a thorough accounting of the total cost of these weapons, and we still don&#8217;t. (The best to date is probably this study by Stephen I. Schwartz and Deepti Choubey, but they don’t claim to capture every [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/debate-needed-on-nuclear-weapons-spending/">Debate Needed on Nuclear Weapons Spending</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/debate-needed-on-nuclear-weapons-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It Goes Beyond the Supercommittee</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/mm32Xrwak90/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/mm32Xrwak90/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Pilon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politico arena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supercommittee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=40726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Roger Pilon</p>Today Politico Arena asks: Should Obama have led the supercommittee? My response: Whether or not Obama had led the supercommittee in its effort to trim a pittance from our federal deficits and debt, the effort was doomed from the start for the reasons committee co-chairman Jeb Hensarling stated in this morning&#8217;s Wall Street Journal:  &#8220;Ultimately, the committee did [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/it-goes-beyond-the-supercommittee/">It Goes Beyond the Supercommittee</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/it-goes-beyond-the-supercommittee/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

