<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; federalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/federalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 22:30:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Immigration Laws at the Supreme Court: Constitutional but Bad Policy</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/IUFJoOwMKCw/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/IUFJoOwMKCw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arizona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preemption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SB 1070]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[supremacy clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade and Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>For anyone suffering from post-Obamacare-argument Supreme Court withdrawal, this Wednesday the Court takes up Arizona&#8217;s controversial Senate Bill (&#8220;SB&#8221;) 1070.  See my blogpost from when the Court granted review for some background. SB 1070 is much-misunderstood: it has nothing to do with sexy political issues like racial profiling and everything to do with boring legal ones like whether a given [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/immigration-laws-at-the-supreme-court-constitutional-but-bad-policy/">Immigration Laws at the Supreme Court: Constitutional but Bad Policy</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/immigration-laws-at-the-supreme-court-constitutional-but-bad-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Surveillance Programs and Their State Impediments</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/MItlpQw5_rk/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/MItlpQw5_rk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 15:37:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cato Publications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national id]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national id system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecom, Internet & Information Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=45497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Jim Harper</p>Having originally come to Washington to defend federalism, I am always delighted to see the division of powers among the states and the federal government have its proper effect: to protect liberty and limited government. As with REAL ID, the E-Verify federal background check system is meeting up with state resistance. The Republican Liberty Caucus [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/national-surveillance-programs-and-their-state-impediments/">National Surveillance Programs and Their State Impediments</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/national-surveillance-programs-and-their-state-impediments/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The REAL ID Fight Continues in the States</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/nKD7F7zOhrE/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/nKD7F7zOhrE/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 13:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michigan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national id]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul opsommer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real id]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real id act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecom, Internet & Information Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=45036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Jim Harper</p>Federal programs almost never die. Bureaucrats and their big-government allies are still trying to cobble together an American national ID. But leaders in the states continue to fight. In this case, it&#8217;s Michigan state representative and House transportation committee chairman Paul Opsommer (R-DeWitt). In response to a recent report citing state compliance with REAL ID [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-real-id-fight-continues-in-the-states/">The REAL ID Fight Continues in the States</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-real-id-fight-continues-in-the-states/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RTD: ‘Insurance Exchange: Just Say No’</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/AE9Tt2sw4Z8/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/AE9Tt2sw4Z8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill hazel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob mcdonnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance exchanges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialized medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>Regarding legislation to create an ObamaCare &#8220;Exchange&#8221; in Virginia, the Richmond Times-Dispatch explains: Republicans at the General Assembly are falling prey to the fallacy of the false alternative&#8230; [H]ere are the real options facing Virginia: (a) federal bureaucrats determine the form of our exchange, or (b) federal bureaucrats determine the form of our exchange. There is [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/rtd-insurance-exchange-just-say-no/">RTD: &#8216;Insurance Exchange: Just Say No&#8217;</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/rtd-insurance-exchange-just-say-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘We Are Not Deciding between Regulation and Autonomy, We Are Deciding Whether or Not We Want a Puppet Government’</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/PdTNuq7oroE/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/PdTNuq7oroE/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 21:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bailout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charles m. arlinghaus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance exchanges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obamacare lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>That&#8217;s how Charlie Arlinghaus, president of New Hampshire&#8217;s Josiah Bartlett Center for Public Policy, describes the decision confronting states about whether to create an ObamaCare Exchange in this op-ed for the New Hampshire Union-Leader.
&#8216;We Are Not Deciding ...<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/we-are-not-deciding-between-regulation-and-autonomy-we-are-deciding-whether-or-not-we-want-a-puppet-government/">&#8216;We Are Not Deciding between Regulation and Autonomy, We Are Deciding Whether or Not We Want a Puppet Government&#8217;</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/we-are-not-deciding-between-regulation-and-autonomy-we-are-deciding-whether-or-not-we-want-a-puppet-government/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacare’s Medicaid Expansion Violates Federalism</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/tLq2wM6Tqos/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/tLq2wM6Tqos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 17:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[affordable care act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coercion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spending clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenth amendment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=42689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>Today Cato filed its second Supreme Court amicus brief in the Obamacare litigation, on the issue of whether the health care law&#8217;s Medicaid expansion is a proper exercise of the Constitution&#8217;s Spending Clause. That is, states must now accept a comprehensive reorganization of Medicaid or forfeit all federal Medicaid funding—even though the spending power is circumscribed [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamacares-medicaid-expansion-violates-federalism/">Obamacare&#8217;s Medicaid Expansion Violates Federalism</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamacares-medicaid-expansion-violates-federalism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morning Bell: New Year’s Resolutions for Conservatives</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/02/morning-bell-new-years-resolutions-for-conservatives/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/02/morning-bell-new-years-resolutions-for-conservatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 12:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Azerrad</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conservative]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Principles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[isolationism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nullification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[states rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=87378</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Let&#8217;s be honest: We all know you&#8217;re not really gonna quit smoking, start exercising, and eat more vegetables as of today. As Emerson wryly remarked: &#8220;All promise outruns performance.&#8221; The key to keeping your New Year&#8217;s resolutions is to make them more realistic. Rather than try to drastically change the way you live, why not start with the more modest goal of changing the way you speak? And what better place to start for conservatives than with America&#8217;s Founding principles? As conservatives continue to rediscover the Declaration of Independence and &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/02/morning-bell-new-years-resolutions-for-conservatives/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/02/morning-bell-new-years-resolutions-for-conservatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

