<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; Finance, Banking &amp; Monetary Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/finance-banking-monetary-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:30:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>In the Lake Wobegon Fantasy World, All Investments Make Money</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/ybnl8tLV9EY/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/ybnl8tLV9EY/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 17:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[creative destruction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Dynamism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance, Banking & Monetary Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=48403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel J. Mitchell</p>I sometimes wonder whether journalists have the slightest idea of how capitalism works. In recent weeks, we&#8217;ve seen breathless reporting on the $2 billion loss at JP Morgan Chase, and now there&#8217;s a big kerfuffle about the falling value of Facebook stock. In response to these supposed scandals, there are all sorts of articles being [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/in-the-lake-wobegon-fantasy-world-all-investments-make-money/">In the Lake Wobegon Fantasy World, All Investments Make Money</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/in-the-lake-wobegon-fantasy-world-all-investments-make-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PPI Considers Ex-Im Debate ‘Senseless’</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/IAvxoABEAfc/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/IAvxoABEAfc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 12:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Ikenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ex-Im]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[export-import bank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance, Banking & Monetary Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade and Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=48306</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel Ikenson</p>What is the proper role of government in a free society? That is not an unreasonable question to debate in the public square – and to revisit with great frequency. ...<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/ppi-considers-ex-im-debate-senseless/">PPI Considers Ex-Im Debate &#8216;Senseless&#8217;</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/ppi-considers-ex-im-debate-senseless/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Top Incomes Rose:  Elasticity Not Corporate Executive Pay</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/pmciXxzeIr0/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/pmciXxzeIr0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 13:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alan Reynolds</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance, Banking & Monetary Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=48162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Alan Reynolds</p>The politically convenient media fascination with incomes of the top 1 percent has degenerated into a new obsession with the top one-tenth of one percent – the top 0.1 percent.  As before, ...<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/why-top-incomes-rose-elasticity-not-corporate-executive-pay/">Why Top Incomes Rose:  Elasticity Not Corporate Executive Pay</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/why-top-incomes-rose-elasticity-not-corporate-executive-pay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Daniel in the Looter’s Den: My Adventures at the UN</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/v6mMS7YwhL8/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/v6mMS7YwhL8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 21:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Simpson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[austerity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance, Banking & Monetary Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Economics and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeffrey Sachs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=48139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel J. Mitchell</p>I was at the United Nations yesterday for something called “The High Level Thematic Debate on the State of the World Economy.”
Most speakers, including the secretary general of the United ...<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/daniel-in-the-looters-den-my-adventures-at-the-un/">Daniel in the Looter&#8217;s Den: My Adventures at the UN</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/daniel-in-the-looters-den-my-adventures-at-the-un/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Limit Access to Deposit Insurance Fund</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/VD7ltceuo3I/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/VD7ltceuo3I/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 16:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark A. Calabria</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance, Banking & Monetary Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Mark A. Calabria</p>The recent losses at JP Morgan have renewed calls to break up the banks and/or increase regulation of the banks.  I&#8217;ve written elsewhere why I believe these losses do not justify more regulation, particularly of the Volcker rule variety.  While I have some sympathy with the break them up view, and a number of people [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/limit-access-to-deposit-insurance-fund/">Limit Access to Deposit Insurance Fund</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/limit-access-to-deposit-insurance-fund/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Too Big to Manage</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/7aietqsEq40/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/7aietqsEq40/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 13:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Boaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance, Banking & Monetary Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By David Boaz</p>Yesterday I asked: If JPMorgan Chase&#8217;s loss of $2 billion shows the need for more bank regulation, what should the federal government&#8217;s $1.3 trillion deficit tell us? And Michael Cannon pointed out that in the private sector, people who make big mistakes tend to lose their jobs, unlike the public sector. Today another theme is [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/too-big-to-manage/">Too Big to Manage</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/too-big-to-manage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Would J.P. Morgan Say?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/Su0CqK9EgQw/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/Su0CqK9EgQw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 20:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gerald P. O'Driscoll</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance, Banking & Monetary Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Gerald P. O'Driscoll</p>Last week it was revealed that derivatives trades gone bad may cost J.P. Morgan Chase bank over $2 billion. The losses apparently are still accumulating at around $150 million per day. A senior manager has already lost her job and perhaps more heads will roll. Why do banks keep racking up such losses? The bank [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/what-would-j-p-morgan-say/">What Would J.P. Morgan Say?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/what-would-j-p-morgan-say/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Krugman Is Wrong about Austerity in Britain – Say the Brits</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/jlc-yaKkwOc/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/jlc-yaKkwOc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 20:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Marian L. Tupy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance, Banking & Monetary Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Economics and Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Marian L. Tupy</p>When, late last month, Great Britain slipped back into recession, New York Times&#8216; Paul Krugman saw it as a vindication of his neo-Keynesian policies. According to Krugman, Britain failed to return to growth, because David Cameron’s government stepped on the fiscal break instead of infusing the British economy with more borrowed funds. My colleagues Juan Carlos Hidalgo from Cato and Veronique [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/krugman-is-wrong-about-austerity-in-britain-say-the-brits/">Krugman Is Wrong about Austerity in Britain – Say the Brits</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/krugman-is-wrong-about-austerity-in-britain-say-the-brits/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Adult Supervision</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/ocznlxz0IoU/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/ocznlxz0IoU/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Boaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance, Banking & Monetary Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By David Boaz</p>Some politicians say that banks need more regulation because JPMorgan Chase lost $2 billion, about 2 percent of its annual revenue. Meanwhile, the federal government will have a deficit of about $1.3 trillion this year, more than half its annual revenue (and about a third of its annual spending). Is there some sort of regulation [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/adult-supervision/">Adult Supervision</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/adult-supervision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street Demands Its Fed Nominees</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/T25yLQXbG-M/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/T25yLQXbG-M/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 16:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mark A. Calabria</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance, Banking & Monetary Policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47687</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Mark A. Calabria</p>Back in March the Senate Banking Committee voted out President Obama&#8217;s latest nominations to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Jeremy Stein and Jerome Powell.  Since then these nominations have remained in limbo because Senator Vitter has objected to moving them by unanimous consent and it appears Majority Leader Harry Reid does [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/wall-street-demands-its-fed-nominees/">Wall Street Demands Its Fed Nominees</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/wall-street-demands-its-fed-nominees/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

