<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; Foreign Policy and National Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/foreign-policy-and-national-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 20:30:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>After-Action Report on Cato’s Panel on the Future of the Navy Surface Fleet</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/k_67XdOcaQc/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/k_67XdOcaQc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 18:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Preble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[littoral combat ship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitt romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shipbuilding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface fleet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[under secretary robert work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warships]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=48358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Christopher Preble</p>Yesterday’s event on the U.S. Navy was a big success and generated a vigorous discussion. Ben Freeman from POGO spelled out his concerns about the littoral combat ship, specifically the Freedom (LCS-1) (documented here and here) and CBO’s Eric Labs raised a few additional ones pertaining to the program as whole. Under Secretary of the [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/after-action-report-on-catos-panel-on-the-future-of-the-navy-surface-fleet/">After-Action Report on Cato’s Panel on the Future of the Navy Surface Fleet</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/after-action-report-on-catos-panel-on-the-future-of-the-navy-surface-fleet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Negotiations with Iran: What Has Changed?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/stC5RXbhIh4/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/stC5RXbhIh4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Justin Logan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baghdad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beinyamin netanyahu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diplomacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[francois hollande]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[istanbul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lindsey grahm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicolas Sarkozy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear proliferation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[p5+1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weapons inspections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yukiya amano]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=48343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Justin Logan</p>May 23, the permanent five members of the UN Security Council, plus Germany (P5+1) will enter into talks with the Iranian leadership about the latter’s nuclear program. The Baghdad talks come on the heels of talks last month in Istanbul. A number of observers have raised expectations for the talks in Baghdad. The latest hopeful [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/negotiations-with-iran-what-has-changed/">Negotiations with Iran: What Has Changed?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/negotiations-with-iran-what-has-changed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should International Bureaucracies Get Taxing Powers or Direct Funding?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/OVCEyASD-rU/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/OVCEyASD-rU/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2012 15:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harmonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Economics and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Statism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax increase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=48325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel J. Mitchell</p>Over the years, I&#8217;ve strenuously objected to schemes that would enable international bureaucracies to levy taxes. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;ve criticized &#8220;direct funding&#8221; proposals, most of which seem to emanate from the United Nations. A scheme to let the United Nations tax services such as air travel. A proposal, pushed by George Soros and other statists, [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/should-international-bureaucracies-get-taxing-powers-or-direct-funding/">Should International Bureaucracies Get Taxing Powers or Direct Funding?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/should-international-bureaucracies-get-taxing-powers-or-direct-funding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NATO Summit Will Reaffirm Afghanistan’s Weakness</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/Ko5aul8smpM/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/Ko5aul8smpM/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 17:03:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malou Innocent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[afghan national security forces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[counterinsurgency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurgency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taliban]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=48102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Malou Innocent</p>The focus of the upcoming NATO summit in Chicago will be Afghanistan. President Obama is expected to speak of the need for solidarity from the international community. His only major success will be a pledge from NATO members to commit funds to Afghanistan well beyond 2014. Difficult questions surrounding the mission’s long-term sustainability will remain [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/nato-summit-will-reaffirm-afghanistans-weakness/">NATO Summit Will Reaffirm Afghanistan’s Weakness</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/nato-summit-will-reaffirm-afghanistans-weakness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NATO Has Become a Form of U.S. Foreign Aid</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/-NTzXhDiRz0/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/-NTzXhDiRz0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 22:40:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Bandow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alliances]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bosnia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[foreign aid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Greece]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Henry Kissinger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kosovo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macedonia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military intervention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NATO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security commitments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Serbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warsaw pact]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=48077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Doug Bandow</p>The NATO summit starts Sunday in Chicago and will be the largest gathering ever held by the alliance. This is fitting given NATO’s desire to act around the globe. While U.S. officials say no decisions on further expanding membership will be made at the meeting, they explain that the door remains open. Adding additional security commitments in this way would be a [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/nato-has-become-a-form-of-u-s-foreign-aid/">NATO Has Become a Form of U.S. Foreign Aid</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/nato-has-become-a-form-of-u-s-foreign-aid/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ignatius on Pakistan: Actually, We May Have Only Had One Year</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/E3ZmDeyK61g/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/E3ZmDeyK61g/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 19:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malou Innocent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[9/11]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Al Qaeda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[david ignatius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[directorate for inter-services intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islamabad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[osama bin laden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pakisan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pervez musharraf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=48055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Malou Innocent</p>In today’s Washington Post, David Ignatius writes that Pakistan is reaping the whirlwind of homegrown terrorism by having “squandered the opportunity presented” with a large-scale U.S. troop presence next door and for refusing to work with Washington to stabilize its mountainous tribal region. Recent history suggests a more complex reality. Mr. Ignatius is correct when [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/ignatius-on-pakistan-actually-we-may-have-only-had-one-year/">Ignatius on Pakistan: Actually, We May Have Only Had One Year</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/ignatius-on-pakistan-actually-we-may-have-only-had-one-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cato to Host Navy Under Secretary to Discuss Surface Fleet</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/dgwimy9XiTQ/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/dgwimy9XiTQ/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 15:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Preble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense appropriations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense authorization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[House Armed Services Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[littoral combat ship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NDAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSBN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[surface fleet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Navy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=48014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Christopher Preble</p>In its markup of the National Defense Authorization Act, the House Armed Services Committee proposed a number of changes to the Obama administration’s plans for the U.S. Navy. The NDAA rescinds the retirement of three cruisers and restricts retirement of ballistic missile submarines (so as not to fall below a minimum of 12). The bill [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/cato-to-host-navy-under-secretary-to-discuss-surface-fleet/">Cato to Host Navy Under Secretary to Discuss Surface Fleet</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/cato-to-host-navy-under-secretary-to-discuss-surface-fleet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Paper Argues for Immediate, Practical Cuts in Military Spending</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/3p4uUQECnXM/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/3p4uUQECnXM/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 15:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Preble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense sense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[departmetn of defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F-35]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LCS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[littoral combat ship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Missile Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. military]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[weapons programs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47886</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Christopher Preble</p>A new report published today by the Project on Defense Alternatives  argues for $17-$20 billion in immediate savings to the Fiscal Year 2013 defense budget. I co-authored the report along with Benjamin Friedman of Cato, and PDA’s Carl Conetta, Charles Knight, and Ethan Rosenkranz. Those savings come from 18 line items—personnel, weapons systems, and programs—that [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/new-paper-argues-for-immediate-practical-cuts-in-military-spending/">New Paper Argues for Immediate, Practical Cuts in Military Spending</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/new-paper-argues-for-immediate-practical-cuts-in-military-spending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Classification Follies</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/5UpmMAtXz10/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/5UpmMAtXz10/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 20:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Julian Sanchez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Julian Sanchez</p>An amusing anecdote about the absurd excesses of our system for classifying &#8220;sensitive&#8221; documents comes by way of the Federation of American Scientists&#8217; Project on Government Secrecy. It seems a researcher had been trying to get access to a 1993 article published in a classified NSA journal, discussing the &#8220;SIGINT&#8221; (or signals intelligence) surrounding the [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/classification-follies/">Classification Follies</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/classification-follies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law of the Sea Treaty: A Tool to Combat Iran, China, and Russia?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/vvRjI2cvAUY/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/vvRjI2cvAUY/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 May 2012 14:41:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Doug Bandow</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[arctic region]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free riding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law of the Sea Treaty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[naval strength]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philippines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seabeds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[South China Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strait of Hormuz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. Navy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Doug Bandow</p>Every few years, the Law of the Sea Treaty rears its head as a one-size-fits-all solution to a host of current maritime problems. This time, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Join Chiefs of Staff, are urging the Senate to ratify the treaty. The officials claim it will act [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/law-of-the-sea-treaty-a-tool-to-combat-iran-china-and-russia/">Law of the Sea Treaty: A Tool to Combat Iran, China, and Russia?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/law-of-the-sea-treaty-a-tool-to-combat-iran-china-and-russia/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

