<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; Foreign Policy and National Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/foreign-policy-and-national-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 23:46:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The ‘Law of Nations’ Is What It Was in 1789</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/b_fDG-jtmpo/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/b_fDG-jtmpo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aliens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ATS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[international law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law of nations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43786</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>One of our oldest laws, the Alien Tort Statute (1789), grants federal courts jurisdiction over lawsuits brought by aliens for actions “in violation of the law of nations.” Courts have differed in their method of interpreting this “law of nations” &#8212; an old way of saying “international law” &#8211; and thus in their decisions on what [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-law-of-nations-is-what-it-was-in-1789/">The &#8216;Law of Nations&#8217; Is What It Was in 1789</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-law-of-nations-is-what-it-was-in-1789/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama’s Neocon Moment</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/dxsxy6bKSyY/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/dxsxy6bKSyY/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Preble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military spending. u.s. grand strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mitt romney]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neoconservatism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[robert kagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Christopher Preble</p>In his State of the Union address, President Obama emphatically declared, “Anyone who tells you that America is in decline or that our influence has waned, doesn’t know what they’re talking about.” Obama sought to put to rest the notion that he is embracing American decline, as GOP candidates Romney, Gingrich and Santorum have accused [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamas-neocon-moment/">Obama&#8217;s Neocon Moment</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamas-neocon-moment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Egypt’s Arab Spring, One Year Later</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/J2V3D2rHFFM/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/J2V3D2rHFFM/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 21:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malou Innocent</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Arab Spring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Egypt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Islam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muslim Brotherhood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revolution]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Malou Innocent</p>As many expected, Islamist parties will form a dominant majority in Egypt’s first freely elected parliament. The Islamists are here to stay and fear-mongering over their rise is unproductive, since Egyptians will judge for themselves whether Islamists are delivering on their promises. Moreover, understanding the dynamics that brought religious parties to power should be the [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/egypt%E2%80%99s-arab-spring-one-year-later/">Egypt’s Arab Spring, One Year Later</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/egypt%e2%80%99s-arab-spring-one-year-later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>On Afghanistan, Panetta Leaves Questions Unanswered</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/2XQ7C7-qE5k/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/2XQ7C7-qE5k/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Preble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Afghanistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nation building]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secretary panetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[u.s. troops. u.s. foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43703</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Christopher Preble</p>Secretary Panetta’s announcement that the U.S. combat mission in Afghanistan will end as early as mid-2013 is a positive development. But it is long overdue and still leaves too many questions unanswered. After more than ten years of war in Afghanistan, the administration should follow through on its commitment to end combat operations and withdraw [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/on-afghanistan-panetta-leaves-questions-unanswered/">On Afghanistan, Panetta Leaves Questions Unanswered</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/on-afghanistan-panetta-leaves-questions-unanswered/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘Destroy America’ = Suspicion Fail</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/pYoxiSo2pQQ/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/pYoxiSo2pQQ/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 13:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data mining]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[destroy America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suspicion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecom, Internet & Information Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tourism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Jim Harper</p>News that incautious comments on &#8220;tweeter&#8221; got British tourists excluded from the United States had Twitter alight yesterday. (Paperwork given to one of the two, on display in this news ...<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/destroy-america-suspicion-fail/">&#8216;Destroy America&#8217; = Suspicion Fail</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/destroy-america-suspicion-fail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Civilian Personnel: The Missing Piece in the Pentagon’s Budget Puzzle</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/VDN2kZtU7Ro/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/VDN2kZtU7Ro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Preble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Pentagon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Christopher Preble</p>While most news stories have accurately characterized the Obama administration’s proposed military spending cuts as “modest,” the Pentagon is planning significant reductions in the number of active-duty troops in the ...<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/civilian-personnel-the-missing-piece-in-the-pentagon%E2%80%99s-budget-puzzle/">Civilian Personnel: The Missing Piece in the Pentagon’s Budget Puzzle</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/civilian-personnel-the-missing-piece-in-the-pentagon%e2%80%99s-budget-puzzle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The New Pentagon Budget: Better, but Not Great</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/AKsfeBAsUh4/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/AKsfeBAsUh4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin H. Friedman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secretary of defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sequestration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Pentagon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. grand strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Benjamin H. Friedman</p>The changes announced in the Pentagon’s new budget guidance are, from my perspective, mostly good news, but woefully insufficient. They show how even limited austerity encourages prioritization among weapons systems ...<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-new-pentagon-budget-better-but-not-great/">The New Pentagon Budget: Better, but Not Great</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-new-pentagon-budget-better-but-not-great/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama’s State of the Union Signals Grand Strategy Status Quo</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/X0OvzWpeUvA/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/X0OvzWpeUvA/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Preble</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[military spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. foreign policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. grand strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Christopher Preble</p>It was clever, though a bit too opportunistic, for the president to begin and end his State of the Union address with references to Iraq, and the sacrifices of the troops. The war has been a disaster for the United States, and for the Iraqi people, of course. But the subject has always been a [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamas-state-of-the-union-signals-grand-strategy-status-quo/">Obama&#8217;s State of the Union Signals Grand Strategy Status Quo</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamas-state-of-the-union-signals-grand-strategy-status-quo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Trouble with the State of the Union: America Is Not a Military Unit</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/qilpga-Ahzk/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/qilpga-Ahzk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Benjamin H. Friedman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civil society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Department of Defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State of the Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. military]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43215</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Benjamin H. Friedman</p>At both the beginning and end of his state of the union address last night, the president suggested that the country can solve its problems by modeling itself after the military.  Near the start he said: At a time when too many of our institutions have let us down, [members of the military] exceed all [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-trouble-with-the-state-of-the-union-america-is-not-a-military-unit/">The Trouble with the State of the Union: America Is Not a Military Unit</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-trouble-with-the-state-of-the-union-america-is-not-a-military-unit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Scary Thought: Do We Really Need “If You See Something, Say Something?”</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/Uwkt5cR5c7Y/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/Uwkt5cR5c7Y/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 21:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Mueller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Counterterrorism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dc metro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dhs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FBI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foreign Policy and National Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homeland security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Janet Napolitano]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[terrorism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By John Mueller</p>At the National Sheriffs’ Association Conference in Washington last week, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano noted that riders on the DC Metro system can hear her voice repeatedly promoting her department’s “If You See Something, Say Something” terrorism hotline campaign. “That’s a scary thought,” she suggested. Even scarier to me is the campaign itself. It [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/a-scary-thought-do-we-really-need-%E2%80%9Cif-you-see-something-say-something%E2%80%9D/">A Scary Thought: Do We Really Need “If You See Something, Say Something?”</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/a-scary-thought-do-we-really-need-%e2%80%9cif-you-see-something-say-something%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

