<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; Fourteenth Amendment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/fourteenth-amendment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:21:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Gay Marriage Still Has an Uphill Climb</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/-BDCnhHxGc8/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/-BDCnhHxGc8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert A. Levy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[court of appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal protection clause]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marital benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prop 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[same-sex marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Robert A. Levy</p>The right answer to the same-sex marriage question is to remove government from the marriage business altogether.  That’s a legislative matter, however, and not something the courts should decree. Until then, because state and federal laws confer benefits based on marital status, the equal protection provisions of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments require that same-sex [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/gay-marriage-still-has-an-uphill-climb/">Gay Marriage Still Has an Uphill Climb</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/gay-marriage-still-has-an-uphill-climb/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Rejects Texas Redistricting Maps, Showing That Modern Voting Rights Act Is Outmoded and Unworkable</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/PWRbfx3oeFA/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/PWRbfx3oeFA/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifteenth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[perry v perez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=42913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>Two weeks ago I wrote about the emergency appeal of Texas&#8217;s new redistricting maps that reached the Supreme Court last month and was argued early last week.  The state argued that the interim maps a three-judge district court in San Antonio drew didn&#8217;t defer sufficiently to the maps passed by the Texas legislature (which could [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/supreme-court-rejects-texas-redistricting-maps-showing-that-modern-voting-rights-act-is-outmoded-and-unworkable/">Supreme Court Rejects Texas Redistricting Maps, Showing That Modern Voting Rights Act Is Outmoded and Unworkable</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/supreme-court-rejects-texas-redistricting-maps-showing-that-modern-voting-rights-act-is-outmoded-and-unworkable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Should Use Texas Redistricting Case to Reconsider Voting Rights Act</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/RPvIzqAm7iI/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/RPvIzqAm7iI/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 13:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[14th amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[15th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifteenth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting Rights Act]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=42044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>The decennial redrawing of electoral districts consistently produces extensive litigation. The most notable cases this cycle come, as they often have, from Texas. A number of activist groups challenged the Texas legislature&#8217;s maps for state house, state senate, and congressional districts, alleging racial discrimination under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act in a special [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/supreme-court-should-use-texas-redistricting-case-to-reconsider-voting-rights-act/">Supreme Court Should Use Texas Redistricting Case to Reconsider Voting Rights Act</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/supreme-court-should-use-texas-redistricting-case-to-reconsider-voting-rights-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rent Control Violates Property Rights and Due Process</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/zk7RLw4JEj4/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/zk7RLw4JEj4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 21:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[due process]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fifth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourteenth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rent control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=40890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>This blogpost was coauthored by Cato legal associate Trevor Burrus, who also worked on the brief discussed below. Rent control is literally a textbook example of bad economic policy. Economics textbooks often use it as an example of how price ceilings create shortages, poor quality goods, and under-the-table dealings. A 1992 survey revealed that 93 [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/rent-control-violates-property-rights-and-due-process/">Rent Control Violates Property Rights and Due Process</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/rent-control-violates-property-rights-and-due-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

