<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; Government and Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/government-and-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:21:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Obama’s Political Prophylactic</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/XvU1DeJF7BU/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/XvU1DeJF7BU/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Pilon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Roger Pilon</p>“White House compromise still guarantees contraceptive coverage for women,” reads the Washington Post headline coming out of President Obama’s press conference this afternoon. Trying to tamp down the escalating political storm his administration created three weeks ago when it ruled that, under Obamacare, employers with religious objections to providing contraceptive and abortifacient coverage must do [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamas-political-prophylactic/">Obama&#8217;s Political Prophylactic</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamas-political-prophylactic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Under ObamaCare, Anti-Discrimination Law Trumps Religious Liberty</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/o4-eDA7wDKY/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/o4-eDA7wDKY/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 14:42:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Pilon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Roger Pilon</p>The three-week battle over ObamaCare’s contraceptive-abortifacient ruling isn’t letting up. Catholics for Choice has a full-page ad in this morning’s Washington Post, urging the president to stay firm. And it’s the lead story today on NPR’s Morning Edition, which in printed form devotes fully 2 of 16 paragraphs&#8212;the last 2&#8212;to the other side (not bad for [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/under-obamacare-anti-discrimination-law-trumps-religious-liberty/">Under ObamaCare, Anti-Discrimination Law Trumps Religious Liberty</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/under-obamacare-anti-discrimination-law-trumps-religious-liberty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cochrane on ObamaCare’s Contraceptive-Coverage Mandate</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/AEQUNgL2dsw/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/AEQUNgL2dsw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraceptives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>My Cato colleague John Cochrane &#8211; who is way smarter than I am &#8212; has a generally excellent op-ed in today&#8217;s Wall Street Journal on ObamaCare&#8217;s contraception mandate: Salting mandated health insurance with birth control is exactly the same as a tax—on employers, on Catholics, on gay men and women, on couples trying to have children and [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/cochrane-on-obamacares-contraceptive-coverage-mandate/">Cochrane on ObamaCare&#8217;s Contraceptive-Coverage Mandate</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/cochrane-on-obamacares-contraceptive-coverage-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Data in New World Bank Report Shows that Large Public Sectors Reduce Economic Growth</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/cxTZtnK8Kks/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/cxTZtnK8Kks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 19:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Economics and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world bank]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel J. Mitchell</p>When Ronald Reagan said that big government undermined the economy, some people dismissed his comments because of his philosophical belief in liberty. And when I discuss my work on the economic impact of government spending, I often get the same reaction. This is why it&#8217;s important that a growing number of establishment outfits are slowly [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/data-in-new-world-bank-report-shows-that-large-public-sectors-reduce-economic-growth/">Data in New World Bank Report Shows that Large Public Sectors Reduce Economic Growth</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/data-in-new-world-bank-report-shows-that-large-public-sectors-reduce-economic-growth/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indian Gaming: The Lobbyists Always Win</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/bqg9X5r0y44/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/bqg9X5r0y44/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 16:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Edwards</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Chris Edwards</p>One of the issues discussed in my new essay on the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is the lobbying by groups of American Indians seeking official tribal status. The BIA has the power to confer tribal status, and it does so in a non-transparent manner. With official status comes tribal access to a wide range [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/indian-gaming-the-lobbyists-always-win/">Indian Gaming: The Lobbyists Always Win</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/indian-gaming-the-lobbyists-always-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RTD: ‘Insurance Exchange: Just Say No’</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/AE9Tt2sw4Z8/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/AE9Tt2sw4Z8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill hazel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob mcdonnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance exchanges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialized medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>Regarding legislation to create an ObamaCare &#8220;Exchange&#8221; in Virginia, the Richmond Times-Dispatch explains: Republicans at the General Assembly are falling prey to the fallacy of the false alternative&#8230; [H]ere are the real options facing Virginia: (a) federal bureaucrats determine the form of our exchange, or (b) federal bureaucrats determine the form of our exchange. There is [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/rtd-insurance-exchange-just-say-no/">RTD: &#8216;Insurance Exchange: Just Say No&#8217;</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/rtd-insurance-exchange-just-say-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ObamaCare’s Coercive Essence</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/ODQYy4mahbo/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/ODQYy4mahbo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Roger Pilon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Roger Pilon</p>Today POLITICO Arena asks: Will the GOP win the birth-control fight? My response: The GOP will win the current contraceptive-abortifacient battle going away, because the average American understands the essence of religious freedom: government cannot force people to do things that violate their religious beliefs. The administration may try to frame this as a defense [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamacares-coercive-essence/">ObamaCare&#8217;s Coercive Essence</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/obamacares-coercive-essence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Wise Crowds Say Individual Mandate Is Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/ME4lVT47lZk/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/ME4lVT47lZk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:47:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FantasySCOTUS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>FantasySCOTUS.net, a project of the Constitution-educating Harlan Institute (on whose non-profit board I sit), has been tracking its 12,000+ members&#8217; predictions in the Obamacare case before the Supreme Court.  You can read more in-depth about the current state of the prediction market &#8212; with fancy graphs! &#8211; but here&#8217;s a summary: 90.6% predict that the lawsuit can [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-wise-crowds-say-individual-mandate-is-unconstitutional/">The Wise Crowds Say Individual Mandate Is Unconstitutional</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-wise-crowds-say-individual-mandate-is-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Senate’s SOPA Counterattack?: Cybersecurity the Undoing of Privacy</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/xriGdFd6fmM/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/xriGdFd6fmM/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybersecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harry reid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pipa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SOPA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecom, Internet & Information Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the daily caller]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Jim Harper</p>The Daily Caller reports that Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) is planning another effort at Internet regulation&#8212;right on the heels of the SOPA/PIPA debacle. The article seems calculated to insinuate that a follow-on to SOPA/PIPA might slip into cybersecurity legislation the Senate plans to take up. Whether that&#8217;s in the works or not, I&#8217;ll detail here [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-senates-sopa-counterattack-cybersecurity-the-undoing-of-privacy/">The Senate&#8217;s SOPA Counterattack?: Cybersecurity the Undoing of Privacy</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-senates-sopa-counterattack-cybersecurity-the-undoing-of-privacy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CPAC Panel on the Constitutionality of Obamacare Has No Lawyers</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/YP4mqJvSB0Q/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/YP4mqJvSB0Q/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 21:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cpac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>Some libertarians boycott CPAC because it&#8217;s &#8220;too conservative,&#8221; others embrace it to try to steer the conservative movement in a more liberty-minded direction (on which, see Reason.tv&#8217;s excellent interview of Sen. Jim DeMint).  I have no principled feelings on the subject.  I&#8217;ve never attended &#8211; wasn&#8217;t really on my radar in college, couldn&#8217;t make it to DC during [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/cpac-panel-on-the-constitutionality-of-obamacare-has-no-lawyers/">CPAC Panel on the Constitutionality of Obamacare Has No Lawyers</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/cpac-panel-on-the-constitutionality-of-obamacare-has-no-lawyers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

