<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 23:08:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cochrane on ObamaCare’s Contraceptive-Coverage Mandate</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/AEQUNgL2dsw/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/AEQUNgL2dsw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Budget]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[birth control]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contraceptives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>My Cato colleague John Cochrane &#8211; who is way smarter than I am &#8212; has a generally excellent op-ed in today&#8217;s Wall Street Journal on ObamaCare&#8217;s contraception mandate: Salting mandated health insurance with birth control is exactly the same as a tax—on employers, on Catholics, on gay men and women, on couples trying to have children and [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/cochrane-on-obamacares-contraceptive-coverage-mandate/">Cochrane on ObamaCare&#8217;s Contraceptive-Coverage Mandate</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/cochrane-on-obamacares-contraceptive-coverage-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>RTD: ‘Insurance Exchange: Just Say No’</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/AE9Tt2sw4Z8/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/AE9Tt2sw4Z8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 15:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill hazel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bob mcdonnell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance exchanges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republicans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialized medicine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>Regarding legislation to create an ObamaCare &#8220;Exchange&#8221; in Virginia, the Richmond Times-Dispatch explains: Republicans at the General Assembly are falling prey to the fallacy of the false alternative&#8230; [H]ere are the real options facing Virginia: (a) federal bureaucrats determine the form of our exchange, or (b) federal bureaucrats determine the form of our exchange. There is [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/rtd-insurance-exchange-just-say-no/">RTD: &#8216;Insurance Exchange: Just Say No&#8217;</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/rtd-insurance-exchange-just-say-no/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>But, But…Price Controls Poll Well!</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/1WlMgVx1n2c/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/1WlMgVx1n2c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLASS Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jason millman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-existing conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Santorum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>Politico&#8216;s Jason Millman writes: How much does Rick Santorum hate President Barack Obama’s health care law? So much that he even opposes the parts a lot of Republicans like. The Republican presidential candidate, talking health care across the street from Minnesota’s Mayo Clinic Monday morning, blasted parts of the Affordable Care Act that poll well [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/but-but-price-controls-poll-well/">But, But&#8230;Price Controls <em>Poll Well</em>!</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/but-but-price-controls-poll-well/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ethos of Universal Coverage</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/2rEHjdoTE5U/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/2rEHjdoTE5U/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortifacients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Universal Coverage Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[associated press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church of universal coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraceptive coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraceptive mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deadweight losses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Essential health benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[excess burden of taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graffiti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kaiser permanente]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[noah berger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[occupy oakland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Occupy Wall Street]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Studies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rent-seeking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxpayers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[universal coverage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Associated Press photojournalist Noah Berger captured this thousand-word image near the Occupy Oakland demonstrations last month. Many Cato@Liberty readers will get it immediately. They can stop reading now. For everyone else, this image perfectly illustrates the ethos of what I call the Church of Universal Coverage. Like everyone who supports a government guarantee of access to medical care, [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-ethos-of-universal-coverage/">The Ethos of Universal Coverage</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-ethos-of-universal-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should New Hampshire Create a Health Insurance Exchange?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/BMb5vjIGxq4/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/BMb5vjIGxq4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:15:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[andrew manuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chairman jim hunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance exchanges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[josiah bartlett]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[socialized medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43903</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The liberty-lovers at New Hampshire&#8217;s Josiah Bartlett Center for Public Policy have produced this video of my appearance before the New Hampshire House of Representatives where I argued against creating health insurance &#8220;Exchanges&#8221;: (Notice my rapt audience.) Should New Hampshire Create a Health Insurance Exchange? is a post from Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/should-new-hampshire-create-a-health-insurance-exchange/">Should New Hampshire Create a Health Insurance Exchange?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/should-new-hampshire-create-a-health-insurance-exchange/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will States Lose Medicaid Funds If They Fail to Create an ObamaCare ‘Exchange’?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/csIb9317BQE/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/csIb9317BQE/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[butch otter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance exchanges]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medicaid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nicholas Toumpas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schip]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social security act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[south dakota v. dole]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In recent weeks, officials from two states have claimed that if they do not set up an ObamaCare health insurance “Exchange,” the state will lose federal Medicaid or State Children’s Health Insurance Program funds. Idaho Gov. Butch Otter (R), has since walked back that claim. New Hampshire Commissioner of Health and Human Services Nicholas Toumpas has [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/will-states-lose-medicaid-funds-if-they-fail-to-create-an-obamacare-%E2%80%98exchange%E2%80%99/">Will States Lose Medicaid Funds If They Fail to Create an ObamaCare ‘Exchange’?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/will-states-lose-medicaid-funds-if-they-fail-to-create-an-obamacare-%e2%80%98exchange%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Real Tragedy of the Komen/Planned Parenthood Flapdoodle</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/om2N-ADDpQg/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/om2N-ADDpQg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLASS Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death panels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPAB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pre-existing conditions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43746</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;is that it overshadowed news that the U.S. House of Representatives overwhelmingly voted to repeal one of two new entitlement programs created by Obamacare&#8212;the ironically named CLASS Act&#8212;with a bipartisan three-fifths majority. (With numbers like that, Congress could even repeal Obamacare&#8217;s death panel!) But really, one private organization pulling funding for another private organization is way [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-real-tragedy-of-the-komenplanned-parenthood-flapdoodle/">The Real Tragedy of the Komen/Planned Parenthood Flapdoodle</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-real-tragedy-of-the-komenplanned-parenthood-flapdoodle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Two Thoughts on Susan G. Komen &amp; Planned Parenthood</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/uqdpkCUa95c/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/uqdpkCUa95c/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortifacients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conscience rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planned parenthood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[susan g. komen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sure that many of you are following the controversy over the Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation&#8217;s decision to suspend its partnership with and funding of Planned Parenthood. Two thoughts on this: First, this controversy provides a delightful contrast to the Obama administration&#8217;s decision to force all Americans to purchase contraceptives and subsidize [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/two-thoughts-on-susan-g-komen-planned-parenthood/">Two Thoughts on Susan G. Komen &#038; Planned Parenthood</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/two-thoughts-on-susan-g-komen-planned-parenthood/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>‘The Problem with CLASS Is That It’s Voluntary.’</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/lHiv5gBd0TA/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/lHiv5gBd0TA/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 22:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adverse selection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child-only coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CLASS Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[death spiral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ezra Klein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kent conrad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ponzi scheme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[price controls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEnator Tom Harkin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>As I write, the House is debating a bill that would repeal the CLASS Act, one of two new entitlements created under ObamaCare. It&#8217;s hard express just how awful this program is. Here&#8217;s my attempt from back in October, when the Obama administration admitted CLASS is a bust: The idea behind CLASS was that the [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-problem-with-class-is-that-its-voluntary/">&#8216;The Problem with CLASS Is That It&#8217;s Voluntary.&#8217;</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-problem-with-class-is-that-its-voluntary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contraceptives Mandate Brings ObamaCare’s Coercive Power into Sharper Focus</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/aom3UmPUNW0/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/aom3UmPUNW0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abortion coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conscience rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraceptive coverage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contraceptive mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e j dionne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employer mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fertility services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[freedom of conscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human embryos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[individual mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kathleen Sebelius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew 26:52]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religious freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usccb]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43610</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>President Obama is catching some well-earned blowback for his decision to force religious institutions &#8220;to pay for health insurance that covers sterilization, contraceptives and abortifacients.&#8221; You see, ObamaCare penalizes individuals (employers) who don&#8217;t purchase (offer) a certain minimum package of health insurance coverage. The Obama administration is demanding that coverage must include the aforementioned reproductive care [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/contraceptives-mandate-brings-obamacares-coercive-power-into-sharper-focus/">Contraceptives Mandate Brings ObamaCare&#8217;s Coercive Power into Sharper Focus</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/contraceptives-mandate-brings-obamacares-coercive-power-into-sharper-focus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

