<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; IRS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/irs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 23:00:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>You Do Know What Makes It a ‘Free’ Market, Right?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/urphftyVLOU/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/urphftyVLOU/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 18:26:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Cannon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[coercion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health care reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[health insurance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare repeal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppaca]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=48116</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Michael F. Cannon</p>Here&#8217;s a poor, unsuccessful letter I sent to the editor of the Washington Post: “Health-care provision at center of Supreme Court debate was a Republican idea” [Mar. 27, A7] describes the health care law Mitt Romney signed while governor of Massachusetts as comprised of “free-market ideas.” Really? RomneyCare’s individual mandate, now mirrored in ObamaCare, uses [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/you-do-know-what-makes-it-a-free-market-right/">You Do Know What Makes It a &#8216;Free&#8217; Market, Right?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/you-do-know-what-makes-it-a-free-market-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Organization for Marriage Seeks Investigation of Stolen IRS File</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/01/watch-live-the-bloggers-briefing-featuring-noms-brian-brown/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/01/watch-live-the-bloggers-briefing-featuring-noms-brian-brown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 15:30:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rob Bluey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family and Religion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[huffington post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Organization for Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scribe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Bloggers Briefing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=97044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />The National Organization for Marriage is asking the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate and prosecute the individuals responsible for leaking the organization’s confidential U.S. tax return and then illegally publishing it. The stolen tax return was first published by the Human Rights Campaign and subsequently the Huffington Post. HRC is led by Joe Solmonese, who also serves as a co-chairman of President Obama&#8217;s reelection committee. In an April 25 letter to Kathryn Keneally, assistant attorney general for DOJ’s tax division, NOM President Brian Brown and Chairman John C. Eastman &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/01/watch-live-the-bloggers-briefing-featuring-noms-brian-brown/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/05/01/watch-live-the-bloggers-briefing-featuring-noms-brian-brown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Supreme Court Gives Taxpayers a Muddled Win</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/TvoE1J8zR9o/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/TvoE1J8zR9o/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Apr 2012 21:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amicus briefs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=47207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>This blogpost was co-authored by Cato legal associate Carl DeNigris. Before the argument on the Arizona immigration case yesterday, the Supreme Court scored a blow for American taxpayers by rejecting the IRS’s attempt to overturn the Court’s prior interpretation of a disputed provision of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. §6501(e)(1)(A).  By avoiding the issue of whether [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/supreme-court-gives-taxpayers-a-muddled-win/">Supreme Court Gives Taxpayers a Muddled Win</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/supreme-court-gives-taxpayers-a-muddled-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Look Out! Obama Puts IRS to Work on Implementing Obamacare</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/04/09/look-out-obama-puts-irs-to-work-on-implementing-obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/04/09/look-out-obama-puts-irs-to-work-on-implementing-obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Brownfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hhs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obama Health Care Plan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=95417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />While the Supreme Court deliberates whether the Affordable Care Act should stand, the Obama Administration is busy at work ensuring that the President&#8217;s health care law is implemented. The Hill reports that the White House has allocated half a billion dollars to the IRS to put Obamacare in place: The Obama administration is quietly diverting roughly $500 million to the IRS to help implement the president’s healthcare law. The money is only part of the IRS’s total implementation spending, and it is being provided outside the normal appropriations process. The &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2012/04/09/look-out-obama-puts-irs-to-work-on-implementing-obamacare/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/04/09/look-out-obama-puts-irs-to-work-on-implementing-obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Watchdogs Raise IRS Security Concerns</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/03/19/federal-watchdogs-raise-irs-security-concerns/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/03/19/federal-watchdogs-raise-irs-security-concerns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:08:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lachlan Markay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GAO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government accountability office]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inspector general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ongoing Priorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scribe]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=93927</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Less than a month from tax day, a pair of reports from federal watchdogs raises serious concerns about the Internal Revenue Service’s handling of sensitive and confidential taxpayer information. Potential security problems reportedly stem from inadequate measures to ensure the security of digital information, and from the IRS’s failure to properly vet the vast majority of its employees. The Government Accountability Office released a report on Friday focusing on the agency’s IT security measures. It found five potentially problematic shortfalls in the IRS’s treatment of digital taxpayer information. …the agency &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2012/03/19/federal-watchdogs-raise-irs-security-concerns/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/03/19/federal-watchdogs-raise-irs-security-concerns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Senators Urge IRS to Leave Politics Out of Tea Party Inquiries</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/03/15/senators-urge-irs-to-leave-politics-out-of-tea-party-inquiries/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/03/15/senators-urge-irs-to-leave-politics-out-of-tea-party-inquiries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 17:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alison Meyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[American Center for Law and Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chuck schumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intimidation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ongoing Priorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Orrin Hatch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rob portman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scribe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tea Party]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://author.blog.heritage.org/?p=93663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />A dozen U.S. senators sent a stern warning to the Internal Revenue Service yesterday: Don’t let politics play a role in recent inquiries of Tea Party organizations. In the past few months, the IRS sent detailed questionnaires to organizations in Kentucky, Ohio, Tennessee and Texas asking about their political activities. Many of those groups have applied for tax-exempt status under Section 501(c)(4) of the tax code. The IRS inquiry comes amid attacks on Tea Party groups from liberals, including seven Democrats who wrote to the IRS last week. “We urge the &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2012/03/15/senators-urge-irs-to-leave-politics-out-of-tea-party-inquiries/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/03/15/senators-urge-irs-to-leave-politics-out-of-tea-party-inquiries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Suing the IRS for Fun and Liberty</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/i1JJ4J0HIEo/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/i1JJ4J0HIEo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ilya Shapiro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulatory Studies]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=45464</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Ilya Shapiro</p>This blogpost was coauthored by Cato legal associate Chaim Gordon. On Tuesday, the Institute for Justice brought a lawsuit to stop recent IRS regulations that require independent tax return preparers to pay a yearly registration fee, take a competency exam, complete 15 hours of IRS-approved continuing education every year, and possibly subject themselves to mandatory [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/suing-the-irs-for-fun-and-liberty/">Suing the IRS for Fun and Liberty</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/suing-the-irs-for-fun-and-liberty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patriotism, Loyalty, Tax Competition, and ‘Tax Fugitives’</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/OeVEhYr-GUI/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/OeVEhYr-GUI/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance, Banking & Monetary Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Thuggery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Economics and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oecd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organization for economic cooperation and development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax avoidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax evasion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax harmonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax haven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel J. Mitchell</p>I fight to preserve tax competition, fiscal sovereignty, and financial privacy for the simple reason that politicians are less likely to impose destructive tax policy if they know that labor and capital can escape to jurisdictions with more responsible fiscal climates. My opponents in this battle are high-tax governments, statist international bureaucracies such as the [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/patriotism-loyalty-tax-competition-and-tax-fugitives/">Patriotism, Loyalty, Tax Competition, and &#8216;Tax Fugitives&#8217;</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/patriotism-loyalty-tax-competition-and-tax-fugitives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patriotism, Loyalty, Tax Competition, and ‘Tax Fugitives’</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/OeVEhYr-GUI/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/OeVEhYr-GUI/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 19:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Finance, Banking & Monetary Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiscal Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Global taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government Thuggery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Bureaucracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Economics and Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[oecd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[organization for economic cooperation and development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sovereignty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Switzerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax avoidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax evasion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax harmonization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax haven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44848</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel J. Mitchell</p>I fight to preserve tax competition, fiscal sovereignty, and financial privacy for the simple reason that politicians are less likely to impose destructive tax policy if they know that labor ...<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/patriotism-loyalty-tax-competition-and-tax-fugitives/">Patriotism, Loyalty, Tax Competition, and &#8216;Tax Fugitives&#8217;</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/patriotism-loyalty-tax-competition-and-tax-fugitives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Academic Study Confirms Previous IMF Analysis, Shows that Lower Tax Rates Are the Best Way to Reduce Tax Evasion</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/qMBkqQMg6EQ/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/qMBkqQMg6EQ/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 15:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[big government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[class warfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flat tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government spending]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal Revenue Service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax avoidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Complexity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax evasion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Underground Economy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel J. Mitchell</p>Leftists want higher tax rates and they want greater tax compliance. But they have a hard time understanding that those goals are inconsistent.
Simply stated, people respond to incentives. When tax ...<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/new-academic-study-confirms-previous-imf-analysis-shows-that-lower-tax-rates-are-the-best-way-to-reduce-tax-evasion/">New Academic Study Confirms Previous IMF Analysis, Shows that Lower Tax Rates Are the Best Way to Reduce Tax Evasion</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/new-academic-study-confirms-previous-imf-analysis-shows-that-lower-tax-rates-are-the-best-way-to-reduce-tax-evasion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

