<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; justice antonin scalia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/justice-antonin-scalia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:21:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Second-Day Story on U.S. v. Jones</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/HlXo7KroOFw/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/HlXo7KroOFw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 17:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice antonin scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecom, Internet & Information Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. v. Jones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Jim Harper</p>Does a more careful reading of the Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in U.S. v. Jones turn up a lurking victory for the government? Modern media moves so fast that the second-day story happens in the afternoon of the first. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday morning that government agents conduct a Fourth Amendment search when they [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-second-day-story-on-u-s-v-jones/">The Second-Day Story on <em>U.S. v. Jones</em></a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-second-day-story-on-u-s-v-jones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. v. Jones: A Big Privacy Win</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/d9uKo9GqadM/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/d9uKo9GqadM/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice antonin scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice samuel alito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice sonia sotomayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasonable expectation of privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecom, Internet & Information Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. v. Jones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Jim Harper</p>The Supreme Court has delivered a big win for privacy in U.S. v. Jones. That&#8217;s the case in which government agents placed a GPS device on a car and used it to track a person round-the-clock for four weeks. The question before the Court was whether the government may do this in the absence of [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/u-s-v-jones-a-big-privacy-win/"><em>U.S. v. Jones</em>: A Big Privacy Win</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/u-s-v-jones-a-big-privacy-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>U.S. v. Jones: A Big Privacy Win</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/d9uKo9GqadM/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/d9uKo9GqadM/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 19:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fourth Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice antonin scalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice samuel alito]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[justice sonia sotomayor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reasonable expectation of privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecom, Internet & Information Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[U.S. v. Jones]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Jim Harper</p>The Supreme Court has delivered a big win for privacy in U.S. v. Jones. That&#8217;s the case in which government agents placed a GPS device on a car and used it to track a person round-the-clock for four weeks. The question before the Court was whether the government may do this in the absence of [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/u-s-v-jones-a-big-privacy-win/"><em>U.S. v. Jones</em>: A Big Privacy Win</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/u-s-v-jones-a-big-privacy-win/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

