<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; Supply-side economics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/supply-side-economics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:15:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Laffer Curve Shows that Tax Increases Are a Very Bad Idea – even if They Generate More Tax Revenue</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/EIVK-FKYPh8/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/EIVK-FKYPh8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 16:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel J. Mitchell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiscal policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[laffer curve]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Political Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply-side economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax avoidance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taxation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=46650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel J. Mitchell</p>The Laffer Curve is a graphical representation of the relationship between tax rates, tax revenue, and taxable income. It is frequently cited by people who want to explain the common-sense notion that punitive tax rates may not generate much additional revenue if people respond in ways that result in less taxable income. Unfortunately, some people [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-laffer-curve-shows-that-tax-increases-are-a-very-bad-idea-even-if-they-generate-more-tax-revenue/">The Laffer Curve Shows that Tax Increases Are a Very Bad Idea – even if They Generate More Tax Revenue</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-laffer-curve-shows-that-tax-increases-are-a-very-bad-idea-even-if-they-generate-more-tax-revenue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fact-Checking President Obama on “Trickle-Down” Economics</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/12/fact-checking-president-obama-on-trickle-down-economics/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/12/fact-checking-president-obama-on-trickle-down-economics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:20:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Weinberger</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bush tax cuts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entitlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Bush]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply-side]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply-side economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trickle-Down Economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=86136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />In a recent speech in Kansas, President Obama launched a diatribe against “trickle-down” economic policies. Not only did President Obama mischaracterize conservative tax policy, but facts rebut his claim that these policies have been a failure. The President began by invoking his understanding of conservative economic philosophy: “If the winners do really well, then jobs and prosperity will eventually trickle down to everybody else.” “Trickle down” is of course a disingenuous misnomer invented by the left to stigmatize conservative supply-side economic policies. It implies favoring the rich—that doing so will &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/12/fact-checking-president-obama-on-trickle-down-economics/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/12/fact-checking-president-obama-on-trickle-down-economics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Morning Bell: Whitewashing History, Obama Style</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/09/morning-bell-whitewashing-history-obama-style/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/09/morning-bell-whitewashing-history-obama-style/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 15:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Brownfield</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Entitlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Keynesian economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Morning Bell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Osawatomie speech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supply-side economics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=85959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />If U.S. history is a painting on a giant canvas, President Barack Obama&#8217;s speech this week in Osawatomie, Kansas, is a thick coat of whitewash layered all over it, and the failure of the last three years lies underneath. The President&#8217;s pretense is that, no, it&#8217;s not Obamanomics that has caused persistent unemployment, stunted growth and record deficits&#8211;it&#8217;s supply side economics! Talk about audacity. The President&#8217;s speech was a naked portrayal of his vision of America&#8211;one where inequality runs rampant, where the American dream is nearly dead, where the rich &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/09/morning-bell-whitewashing-history-obama-style/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2011/12/09/morning-bell-whitewashing-history-obama-style/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

