<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; Trade and Immigration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/trade-and-immigration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 15:21:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is the U.S. Trade Representative a Closet Free Trader?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/Z_tV63QFPG8/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/Z_tV63QFPG8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 21:36:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Ikenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antidumping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kirk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade and Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wto]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43996</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel Ikenson</p>Not to get him in trouble with his boss, but U.S. Trade Representative Ron Kirk has been sounding like a free trader lately. I’m beginning to think Ambassador Kirk consumes the analyses we produce over here at the Cato Institute’s Herbert A. Stiefel Center for Trade Policy Studies. Well, let me rephrase: that he consumes [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/is-the-u-s-trade-representative-a-closet-free-trader/">Is the U.S. Trade Representative a Closet Free Trader?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/is-the-u-s-trade-representative-a-closet-free-trader/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cardless National ID and the E-Verify Rebellion</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/eWa-SKy_20Q/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/eWa-SKy_20Q/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 21:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harper</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[national id]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neal Kurk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new hampshire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[real id]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seth Cohn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecom, Internet & Information Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade and Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Hampshire was the state where the &#8220;REAL ID rebellion&#8221; got its start. There, in 2006, Rep. Neal Kurk (R-Weare) took to the floor of the New Hampshire House to talk about his principled opposition to the federal national ID law. In stirring words, Kurk urged his colleagues to overturn a committee recommendation that no [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/cardless-national-id-and-the-e-verify-rebellion/">Cardless National ID and the E-Verify Rebellion</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/cardless-national-id-and-the-e-verify-rebellion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Agriculture and Trade Links</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/9HCOmetjd9o/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/9HCOmetjd9o/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sallie James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade and Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Sallie James</p>A very good editorial on Bloomberg.com on farm subsidies, and why the &#8220;let&#8217;s swap direct payments for crop insurance&#8221; proposal is a bad deal for taxpayers. American Farm Bureau Federation President Bob Stallman isn&#8217;t exactly a poster child for the farm program reform movement, but here he writes something I didn&#8217;t think would ever flow from [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/agriculture-and-trade-links/">Agriculture and Trade Links</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/agriculture-and-trade-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The President’s Heroics and Other Tall Tales about the Auto Industry</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/v1kRWhMVG5Q/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/v1kRWhMVG5Q/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 21:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Ikenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax and Budget Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade and Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel Ikenson</p>Newt Gingrich defeated communism, someone hacked Anthony Weiner&#8217;s Twitter account, and President Obama saved the U.S. automobile industry.  Grandiosity, denial, and revisionism are all noted indulgences of the political breed.  That&#8217;s why we should always be skeptical of their words and pity the partisan lemmings who mindlessly parrot their rhetoric. In his SOTU speech last night, the president claimed [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-presidents-heroics-and-other-tall-tales-about-the-auto-industry/">The President&#8217;s Heroics and Other Tall Tales about the Auto Industry</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-presidents-heroics-and-other-tall-tales-about-the-auto-industry/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SOTU and Trade: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/4e5P02_Oy_s/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/4e5P02_Oy_s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sallie James</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade and Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Sallie James</p>President Obama’s State of the Union address last night was, in my opinion, pretty awful (although James Pethokoukis at the American Enterprise Institute thinks it could have been worse). I know SOTUs are political theater at its worst, and I watch them always with something not unlike disgust, but I found almost nothing to like in the [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/sotu-and-trade-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/">SOTU and Trade: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/sotu-and-trade-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>President Obama Could Improve Relations with China at the Stroke of His Pen</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/Ry4sGQanei8/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/Ry4sGQanei8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 22:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Ikenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antidumping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CAFC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[China]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CVD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade and Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel Ikenson</p>When China joined the WTO in December 2001, one of the many terms it agreed to was to allow the United States to continue to treat it as a &#8220;non-market economy&#8220; under U.S. antidumping law for a period of 15 years. China has regretted that concession ever since, and there are precious few gestures that [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/president-obama-could-improve-relations-with-china-at-the-stroke-of-his-pen/">President Obama Could Improve Relations with China at the Stroke of His Pen</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/president-obama-could-improve-relations-with-china-at-the-stroke-of-his-pen/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Panel Makers’ Petition</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/9l1XEr9Ou6U/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/9l1XEr9Ou6U/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David Boaz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade and Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=42798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By David Boaz</p>One of the most famous documents in the history of free-trade literature is Bastiat&#8216;s famous “Candlemakers’ Petition.” In that parody, the French economist and parliamentarian imagined the makers of candles and street lamps petitioning the French Chamber of Deputies for protection from a most dastardly foreign competitor: You are on the right track. You reject abstract theories and have [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-panel-makers-petition/">The Panel Makers&#8217; Petition</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/the-panel-makers-petition/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Does the U.S. Economy Need More Boeings or More Facebooks?</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/JEYfgjzih2s/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/JEYfgjzih2s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 19:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Ikenson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Boeing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economic growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industrial policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manufacturing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade and Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=42535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel Ikenson</p>Remember the story of that once-great nation that sacrificed its well-paying manufacturing jobs for low-wage, burger-flipping jobs at the altar of free trade? At one time, that story was a popular rejoinder of manufacturing unions and their apologists to the inconvenient facts that, despite manufacturing employment attrition, the economy was producing an average of 1.84 [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/does-the-u-s-economy-need-more-boeings-or-more-facebooks/">Does the U.S. Economy Need More Boeings or More Facebooks?</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/does-the-u-s-economy-need-more-boeings-or-more-facebooks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GOP the Loser in Primary Fight over Immigration</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/MivpkzFPyvE/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/MivpkzFPyvE/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 16:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Griswold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[illegal immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration reform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowa caucuses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican presidential nomination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ronald reagan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade and Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=42091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel Griswold</p>Over at National Review Online this morning, I ask how the Ronald Reagan of 1980 would have fared in today’s Iowa caucuses given his views on how to tackle illegal immigration (“GOP Candidates Betray the Spirit of Reagan on Immigration”). My conclusion, based on the current mood of many Republicans, is that Reagan would have [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/gop-the-loser-in-primary-fight-over-immigration/">GOP the Loser in Primary Fight over Immigration</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/gop-the-loser-in-primary-fight-over-immigration/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Our Freedom to Trade Expanded in 2011</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/MedUWq4tKZA/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/MedUWq4tKZA/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Griswold</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade and Immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=42045</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Daniel Griswold</p>The news right now is full of retrospective stories about 2011. Not to be left out, here are a few observations on the real if modest progress made in 2011 to expand the freedom of Americans to trade in the global economy. (I’ll add links along the way to related Cato work.) After four years [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/our-freedom-to-trade-expanded-in-2011/">Our Freedom to Trade Expanded in 2011</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/our-freedom-to-trade-expanded-in-2011/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

