<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SaddleBrooke Republican Club &#187; transportation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sbrc1.net/tag/transportation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sbrc1.net</link>
	<description>Western United States Largest Republican Club</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 19:15:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>This One’s a True Porker</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/O_cjgPzGHkw/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/O_cjgPzGHkw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randal O'Toole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy and Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government and Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=45489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Randal O'Toole</p>The Senate passed a transportation bill this week to replace a House bill that was killed by fiscal conservatives for being filled with &#8220;pork and special interest projects.&#8221; Not surprisingly, the Senate bill is far worse. Where the House bill authorized deficit spending to the tune of about $10 billion a year, the Senate bill [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/this-ones-a-true-porker/">This One&#8217;s a True Porker</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/this-ones-a-true-porker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fixing the House Transportation Bill</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/sMetdj7Zxc0/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/sMetdj7Zxc0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randal O'Toole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy and Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=44258</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>By Randal O'Toole</p>After catching flack from both fiscal conservatives and the transit lobby, House Speaker John Boehner has postponed consideration of a surface transportation bill. Fiscal conservatives (including my fellow Cato scholar ...<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/fixing-the-house-transportation-bill/">Fixing the House Transportation Bill</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/fixing-the-house-transportation-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Transportation Agreement Seems Remote</title>
		<link>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/pi7NVvsz_wo/</link>
		<comments>http://feeds.cato.org/~r/Cato-at-liberty/~3/pi7NVvsz_wo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 13:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Randal O'Toole</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy and Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/?p=43721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[House Republicans and Senate Democrats remain at loggerheads over the future of federal highway and transit funding. Although House Transportation &#038; Infrastructure Committee Chair John Mica introduced a compromise transportation bill this week, few are pleased with his proposal. Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood, for example, calls it &#8220;the worst transportation bill&#8221; he has ever [...]<p><a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/transportation-agreement-seems-remote/">Transportation Agreement Seems Remote</a> is a post from <a href="http://www.cato-at-liberty.org">Cato @ Liberty - Cato Institute Blog</a></p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/transportation-agreement-seems-remote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>D.C. Taxi Commission Faces Backlash for Sting Operation on New Car Service</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/17/d-c-taxi-commission-faces-backlash-for-sting-operation-on-new-car-service/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/17/d-c-taxi-commission-faces-backlash-for-sting-operation-on-new-car-service/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lachlan Markay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[competition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[District of Columbia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[innovation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ongoing Priorities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scribe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[washington]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://author.blog.heritage.org/?p=88440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />A District of Columbia city council member is calling on the city’s taxicab commission to allow competition to its “mediocre and unreliable” taxi services in the wake of a sting operation aimed at shutting down an innovative car service that officials say violates a number of city laws. If current law prohibits such competition, stated Mary M. Cheh (D-Ward 3), the law should be amended to allow for “improve[d] transportation options for residents and visitors alike.” Cheh’s statement comes days after city officials conducted a sting operation on Uber, an &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/17/d-c-taxi-commission-faces-backlash-for-sting-operation-on-new-car-service/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/17/d-c-taxi-commission-faces-backlash-for-sting-operation-on-new-car-service/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Falsehoods Abound in Case of California High-Speed Rail</title>
		<link>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/10/falsehoods-abound-in-case-of-california-high-speed-rail/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/10/falsehoods-abound-in-case-of-california-high-speed-rail/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 23:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emily Goff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[budget deficit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California High-Speed Rail Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise and Free Markets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[transportation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.heritage.org/?p=88032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<br />Last week, the independent California High-Speed Rail Peer Review Group recommended that the state legislature not proceed with funding the proposed Los Angeles–San Francisco project. Its argument was grounded in concerns about “the California High-Speed Rail Authority&#8217;s plan to start construction without any assurance of future funding from the federal government,” according to The Wall Street Journal. The California High-Speed Rail Authority responded with a “you’ll be sorry” statement, asserting that it will cost Californians more not to build the system. It argued that the cost of expanding airports and &#8230; <a href="http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/10/falsehoods-abound-in-case-of-california-high-speed-rail/"><span>More</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.heritage.org/2012/01/10/falsehoods-abound-in-case-of-california-high-speed-rail/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

